A stitch in time saves nine? A repeated cross-sectional case study on the implementation of the intersectoral community approach Youth At a Healthy Weight
| dc.contributor.author | van der Kleij, Rianne | en_ZA |
| dc.contributor.author | Crone, Mathilde R | en_ZA |
| dc.contributor.author | Paulussen, Theo | en_ZA |
| dc.contributor.author | van de Gaar, Vivan | en_ZA |
| dc.contributor.author | Reis, Ria | en_ZA |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-07T08:47:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-12-07T08:47:51Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | en_ZA |
| dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: The implementation of programs complex in design, such as the intersectoral community approach Youth At a Healthy Weight (JOGG), often deviates from their application as intended. There is limited knowledge of their implementation processes, making it difficult to formulate sound implementation strategies. METHODS: For two years, we performed a repeated cross-sectional case study on the implementation of a JOGG fruit and water campaign targeting children age 0-12. Semi-structured observations, interviews, field notes and professionals' logs entries were used to evaluate implementation process. Data was analyzed via a framework approach; within-case and cross-case displays were formulated and key determinants identified. Principles from Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) were used to identify causal configurations of determinants per sector and implementation phase. RESULTS: Implementation completeness differed, but was highest in the educational and health care sector, and higher for key than additional activities. Determinants and causal configurations of determinants were mostly sector- and implementation phase specific. High campaign ownership and possibilities for campaign adaptation were most frequently mentioned as facilitators. A lack of reinforcement strategies, low priority for campaign use and incompatibility of own goals with campaign goals were most often indicated as barriers.DISCUSSION:We advise multiple 'stitches in time'; tailoring implementation strategies to specific implementation phases and sectors using both the results from this study and a mutual adaptation strategy in which professionals are involved in the development of implementation strategies. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the implementation process of IACOs is complex and sustainable implementation is difficult to achieve. Moreover, this study reveals that the implementation process is influenced by predominantly sector and implementation phase specific (causal configurations of) determinants. | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.apacitation | van der Kleij, R., Crone, M. R., Paulussen, T., van de Gaar, V., & Reis, R. (2015). A stitch in time saves nine? A repeated cross-sectional case study on the implementation of the intersectoral community approach Youth At a Healthy Weight. <i>BMC Public Health</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15633 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.chicagocitation | van der Kleij, Rianne, Mathilde R Crone, Theo Paulussen, Vivan van de Gaar, and Ria Reis "A stitch in time saves nine? A repeated cross-sectional case study on the implementation of the intersectoral community approach Youth At a Healthy Weight." <i>BMC Public Health</i> (2015) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15633 | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.citation | van der Kleij, R. M., Crone, M. R., Paulussen, T. G., van de Gaar, V. M., & Reis, R. (2015). A stitch in time saves nine? A repeated cross-sectional case study on the implementation of the intersectoral community approach Youth At a Healthy Weight. BMC public health, 15(1), 1032. | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.ris | TY - Journal Article AU - van der Kleij, Rianne AU - Crone, Mathilde R AU - Paulussen, Theo AU - van de Gaar, Vivan AU - Reis, Ria AB - BACKGROUND: The implementation of programs complex in design, such as the intersectoral community approach Youth At a Healthy Weight (JOGG), often deviates from their application as intended. There is limited knowledge of their implementation processes, making it difficult to formulate sound implementation strategies. METHODS: For two years, we performed a repeated cross-sectional case study on the implementation of a JOGG fruit and water campaign targeting children age 0-12. Semi-structured observations, interviews, field notes and professionals' logs entries were used to evaluate implementation process. Data was analyzed via a framework approach; within-case and cross-case displays were formulated and key determinants identified. Principles from Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) were used to identify causal configurations of determinants per sector and implementation phase. RESULTS: Implementation completeness differed, but was highest in the educational and health care sector, and higher for key than additional activities. Determinants and causal configurations of determinants were mostly sector- and implementation phase specific. High campaign ownership and possibilities for campaign adaptation were most frequently mentioned as facilitators. A lack of reinforcement strategies, low priority for campaign use and incompatibility of own goals with campaign goals were most often indicated as barriers.DISCUSSION:We advise multiple 'stitches in time'; tailoring implementation strategies to specific implementation phases and sectors using both the results from this study and a mutual adaptation strategy in which professionals are involved in the development of implementation strategies. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the implementation process of IACOs is complex and sustainable implementation is difficult to achieve. Moreover, this study reveals that the implementation process is influenced by predominantly sector and implementation phase specific (causal configurations of) determinants. DA - 2015 DB - OpenUCT DO - 10.1186/s12889-015-2306-0 DP - University of Cape Town J1 - BMC Public Health LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2015 T1 - A stitch in time saves nine? A repeated cross-sectional case study on the implementation of the intersectoral community approach Youth At a Healthy Weight TI - A stitch in time saves nine? A repeated cross-sectional case study on the implementation of the intersectoral community approach Youth At a Healthy Weight UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15633 ER - | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15633 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2306-0 | |
| dc.identifier.vancouvercitation | van der Kleij R, Crone MR, Paulussen T, van de Gaar V, Reis R. A stitch in time saves nine? A repeated cross-sectional case study on the implementation of the intersectoral community approach Youth At a Healthy Weight. BMC Public Health. 2015; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15633. | en_ZA |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher | BioMed Central Ltd | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher.department | Children's Institute of UCT | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Faculty of Health Sciences | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher.institution | University of Cape Town | |
| dc.rights | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License | en_ZA |
| dc.rights.holder | 2015 van der Kleij et al. | en_ZA |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en_ZA |
| dc.source | BMC Public Health | en_ZA |
| dc.source.uri | http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpublichealth/ | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Childhood obesity | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Intersectoral community approach | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Implementation | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Qualitative methods | en_ZA |
| dc.subject.other | Process evaluation | en_ZA |
| dc.title | A stitch in time saves nine? A repeated cross-sectional case study on the implementation of the intersectoral community approach Youth At a Healthy Weight | en_ZA |
| dc.type | Journal Article | en_ZA |
| uct.type.filetype | Text | |
| uct.type.filetype | Image | |
| uct.type.publication | Research | en_ZA |
| uct.type.resource | Article | en_ZA |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- van_der_Kleij_A_stitch_in_time_saves_nine_2015.pdf
- Size:
- 879.83 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: