Cost-effectiveness of nebulised ipratropium as adjunctive therapy in acute asthma

dc.contributor.authorParrish, A Gen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-24T07:28:17Z
dc.date.available2017-08-24T07:28:17Z
dc.date.issued1993en_ZA
dc.date.updated2017-07-10T12:48:18Z
dc.description.abstractAim: To determine whether the addition of nebulised ipratropium to the therapy of acute asthma leads to a cost-effective reduction in the mean duration of admission and time to maximum peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR). Method: Patients with an admission diagnosis of acute asthma were studied in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which they received a standard therapeutic regimen of continuous intravenous aminophylline, 4-hourly fenoterol nebulisation, intravenous methylprednisolone 125mg 12-hourly, and, every four hours, either nebulised saline placebo or ipratropium bromide 500mcg in 3ml saline. Data on age, gender, initial and maximum PEFR, time to maximum PEFR, and duration of hospital stay was collected from the hospital record after discharge. Statistical techniques: 2-way contingency tables for categorical variables, 1-way ANOVA for treatment effects, and life-table analysis of the time till discharge. Results: Records of 279 of the 400 patients entered in the study were suitable for analysis after excluding re-admissions, non-asthmatics and incomplete records. Baseline comparisons of age and severity on presentation showed no significant differences. The trial group did not differ significantly from the control group with respect to either time to PEFR (respectively 21.11 hours (SD 14.3) versus 22.89 (SD 15.82)) or duration of admission (5.02 (SD 3.65) versus 5.38 (SD 3.13) 6-hour units). In a sub-group of patients (n=155) demonstrating more than 100% improvement in PEFR, the time to maximum PEFR was significantly shorter in the ipratropium group (20.35 hours SD 12.4) versus 25.20 hours (SD 17.0); p= 0.045). Conclusion: The addition of ipratropium bromide to a standard treatment regimen for acute asthma reduced the time to achieve maximum PEFR in a sub-group of patients with markedly reversible airflow limitation. Overall, however, the addition did not prove cost-effective.en_ZA
dc.identifier.apacitationParrish, A. G. (1993). <i>Cost-effectiveness of nebulised ipratropium as adjunctive therapy in acute asthma</i>. (Thesis). University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Health Sciences ,Department of Medicine. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/24972en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationParrish, A G. <i>"Cost-effectiveness of nebulised ipratropium as adjunctive therapy in acute asthma."</i> Thesis., University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Health Sciences ,Department of Medicine, 1993. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/24972en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationParrish, A. 1993. Cost-effectiveness of nebulised ipratropium as adjunctive therapy in acute asthma. University of Cape Town.en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Thesis / Dissertation AU - Parrish, A G AB - Aim: To determine whether the addition of nebulised ipratropium to the therapy of acute asthma leads to a cost-effective reduction in the mean duration of admission and time to maximum peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR). Method: Patients with an admission diagnosis of acute asthma were studied in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which they received a standard therapeutic regimen of continuous intravenous aminophylline, 4-hourly fenoterol nebulisation, intravenous methylprednisolone 125mg 12-hourly, and, every four hours, either nebulised saline placebo or ipratropium bromide 500mcg in 3ml saline. Data on age, gender, initial and maximum PEFR, time to maximum PEFR, and duration of hospital stay was collected from the hospital record after discharge. Statistical techniques: 2-way contingency tables for categorical variables, 1-way ANOVA for treatment effects, and life-table analysis of the time till discharge. Results: Records of 279 of the 400 patients entered in the study were suitable for analysis after excluding re-admissions, non-asthmatics and incomplete records. Baseline comparisons of age and severity on presentation showed no significant differences. The trial group did not differ significantly from the control group with respect to either time to PEFR (respectively 21.11 hours (SD 14.3) versus 22.89 (SD 15.82)) or duration of admission (5.02 (SD 3.65) versus 5.38 (SD 3.13) 6-hour units). In a sub-group of patients (n=155) demonstrating more than 100% improvement in PEFR, the time to maximum PEFR was significantly shorter in the ipratropium group (20.35 hours SD 12.4) versus 25.20 hours (SD 17.0); p= 0.045). Conclusion: The addition of ipratropium bromide to a standard treatment regimen for acute asthma reduced the time to achieve maximum PEFR in a sub-group of patients with markedly reversible airflow limitation. Overall, however, the addition did not prove cost-effective. DA - 1993 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 1993 T1 - Cost-effectiveness of nebulised ipratropium as adjunctive therapy in acute asthma TI - Cost-effectiveness of nebulised ipratropium as adjunctive therapy in acute asthma UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/24972 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/24972
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationParrish AG. Cost-effectiveness of nebulised ipratropium as adjunctive therapy in acute asthma. [Thesis]. University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Health Sciences ,Department of Medicine, 1993 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/24972en_ZA
dc.language.isoengen_ZA
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Medicineen_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Health Sciencesen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.subject.otherAsthma - Drug therapy~Ipratropiumen_ZA
dc.titleCost-effectiveness of nebulised ipratropium as adjunctive therapy in acute asthmaen_ZA
dc.typeMaster Thesis
dc.type.qualificationlevelMasters
dc.type.qualificationnameMMeden_ZA
uct.type.filetype
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
uct.type.publicationResearchen_ZA
uct.type.resourceThesisen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Parrish_Cost_effectiveness_1993_1.pdf
Size:
3.2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections