The approach of the Supreme Court of Appeal to the interpretation of fiscal legislation and the (unintentional) demise of the contra fiscum principle

Thesis / Dissertation

2024

Permanent link to this Item
Authors
Supervisors
Journal Title
Link to Journal
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Publisher

University of Cape Town

License
Series
Abstract
The decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal in Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality 2012 (4) SA 593 (SCA) (“Endumeni”) enjoins the courts, when interpreting legislation, to consider the context of the document as a whole, in light of all the relevant circumstances. The contra fiscum principle provides that, in cases of ambiguity, legislation imposing a burden on a taxpayer should be construed in favour of the taxpayer (and against the fiscus). This thesis examines the approach of the Supreme Court of Appeal to the interpretation of fiscal legislation since its decision in Endumeni and asks whether this approach is compatible with the continued survival of the contra fiscum principle in South African law.
Description

Reference:

Collections