Are human identification methods effectively utilised? a retrospective review of unidentified remains between 2019-2020 at Salt River mortuary, Cape Town, South Africa

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorHeathfield, Laura
dc.contributor.authorDharamdev, Kisharia
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-15T12:41:37Z
dc.date.available2025-08-15T12:41:37Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.date.updated2025-08-06T12:16:48Z
dc.description.abstractUnidentified human remains (UHRs) are a global issue, particularly in developing nations. Various identification methods exist ranging from visual recognition to DNA profiling. While DNA is utilised at Salt River Mortuary (SRM), there is slow turnaround and seldom feedback from the state laboratory. Thus in 2020, SRM began submitting samples for DNA profiling to a private laboratory (Unistel) as well. It is currently unknown whether this agreement has improved identification outcomes. To address this, post-mortem records from 7672 cases admitted to SRM in 2019 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Of those, 1101 cases (14.4%) had unconfirmed identities seven days after admission. Subsequently, 84.7% (n=933/1101) were identified using visual recognition (86.3%; n=805/933) with requests in fingerprint analysis (74.3%; n=693/933) and success rate of DNA profiling slightly higher in 2020 (45 %; n=117/260) compared to 2019 (42 %; n=120/286); with 15.3% (n=168/1101) of decedents remaining unidentified (UHRs). Of the 168 UHRs, DNA profiling was requested in 69% (n=116/168) and notably, 19% (n=32/168) had no identification attempts with stillbirth and non-viable cases accounting for 68.8% (n=22/32) of these. On average, DNA profiling was requested within 27 days of post-mortem in 2020. Retrospective DNA profiling of 2019 UHR cases (29.9%) was requested following the Unistel agreement. Where UHR DNA profiling was requested from Unistel, reports were obtained in 37.9% (n=44/116). However, DNA profiles from Unistel were not uploaded onto the National Forensic DNA Database of South Africa, which limits the value of DNA as an identification tool in cases without an alleged family member available for comparison. The remainder of cases were sent to the state laboratory (n=72/116), but only 8.3% (n=6/72) of reports were received. These findings indicate that using a private laboratory improved the success rate of DNA for identification at SRM, when kinship analysis was possible. Still, improved collaboration between private and state DNA laboratories is required to facilitate investigative leads using the DNA database.
dc.identifier.apacitationDharamdev, K. (2025). <i>Are human identification methods effectively utilised? a retrospective review of unidentified remains between 2019-2020 at Salt River mortuary, Cape Town, South Africa</i>. (). University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Health Sciences ,Department of Pathology. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41588en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationDharamdev, Kisharia. <i>"Are human identification methods effectively utilised? a retrospective review of unidentified remains between 2019-2020 at Salt River mortuary, Cape Town, South Africa."</i> ., University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Health Sciences ,Department of Pathology, 2025. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41588en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationDharamdev, K. 2025. Are human identification methods effectively utilised? a retrospective review of unidentified remains between 2019-2020 at Salt River mortuary, Cape Town, South Africa. . University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Health Sciences ,Department of Pathology. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41588en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Thesis / Dissertation AU - Dharamdev, Kisharia AB - Unidentified human remains (UHRs) are a global issue, particularly in developing nations. Various identification methods exist ranging from visual recognition to DNA profiling. While DNA is utilised at Salt River Mortuary (SRM), there is slow turnaround and seldom feedback from the state laboratory. Thus in 2020, SRM began submitting samples for DNA profiling to a private laboratory (Unistel) as well. It is currently unknown whether this agreement has improved identification outcomes. To address this, post-mortem records from 7672 cases admitted to SRM in 2019 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Of those, 1101 cases (14.4%) had unconfirmed identities seven days after admission. Subsequently, 84.7% (n=933/1101) were identified using visual recognition (86.3%; n=805/933) with requests in fingerprint analysis (74.3%; n=693/933) and success rate of DNA profiling slightly higher in 2020 (45 %; n=117/260) compared to 2019 (42 %; n=120/286); with 15.3% (n=168/1101) of decedents remaining unidentified (UHRs). Of the 168 UHRs, DNA profiling was requested in 69% (n=116/168) and notably, 19% (n=32/168) had no identification attempts with stillbirth and non-viable cases accounting for 68.8% (n=22/32) of these. On average, DNA profiling was requested within 27 days of post-mortem in 2020. Retrospective DNA profiling of 2019 UHR cases (29.9%) was requested following the Unistel agreement. Where UHR DNA profiling was requested from Unistel, reports were obtained in 37.9% (n=44/116). However, DNA profiles from Unistel were not uploaded onto the National Forensic DNA Database of South Africa, which limits the value of DNA as an identification tool in cases without an alleged family member available for comparison. The remainder of cases were sent to the state laboratory (n=72/116), but only 8.3% (n=6/72) of reports were received. These findings indicate that using a private laboratory improved the success rate of DNA for identification at SRM, when kinship analysis was possible. Still, improved collaboration between private and state DNA laboratories is required to facilitate investigative leads using the DNA database. DA - 2025 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - Biomedical Forensic Science LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2025 T1 - Are human identification methods effectively utilised? a retrospective review of unidentified remains between 2019-2020 at Salt River mortuary, Cape Town, South Africa TI - Are human identification methods effectively utilised? a retrospective review of unidentified remains between 2019-2020 at Salt River mortuary, Cape Town, South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41588 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/41588
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationDharamdev K. Are human identification methods effectively utilised? a retrospective review of unidentified remains between 2019-2020 at Salt River mortuary, Cape Town, South Africa. []. University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Health Sciences ,Department of Pathology, 2025 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/41588en_ZA
dc.language.isoen
dc.language.rfc3066eng
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Pathology
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.subjectBiomedical Forensic Science
dc.titleAre human identification methods effectively utilised? a retrospective review of unidentified remains between 2019-2020 at Salt River mortuary, Cape Town, South Africa
dc.typeThesis / Dissertation
dc.type.qualificationlevelMasters
dc.type.qualificationlevelMPhil
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_hsf_2025_dharamdev kisharia.pdf
Size:
1.77 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Masters