What factors influence mitigative capacity?
dc.contributor.author | Winkler, Harald | |
dc.contributor.author | Blanchard, Odile | |
dc.contributor.author | Robinson, John | |
dc.contributor.author | Baumert, Kevin | |
dc.contributor.author | Burch, Sarah | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-02-05T11:15:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-02-05T11:15:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.updated | 2016-02-03T08:48:40Z | |
dc.description.abstract | This article builds on Yohe’s seminal piece on mitigative capacity, which elaborates ‘determinants’ of mitigative capacity, also reflected in the IPCC’s third assessment report. We propose a revised definition, where mitigative capacity is a country’s ability to reduce anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions or enhance natural sinks. By ‘‘ability’’ we mean skills, competencies, fitness, and proficiencies that a country has attained which can contribute to GHG emissions mitigation. A conceptual framework is proposed, linking mitigative capacity to a country’s sustainable development path, and grouping the factors influencing mitigative capacity into three main sets: economic factors, institutional ones, and technology. Both quantitative and qualitative analysis of factors is presented, showing how these factors vary across countries. We suggest that it is the interplay between the three economic factors—income, abatement cost and opportunity cost—that shape mitigative capacity. We find that income is an important economic factor influencing mitigative capacity, while abatement cost is important in turning mitigative capacity into actual mitigation. Technology is a critical mitigative capacity, including the ability to absorb existing climate-friendly technologies or to develop innovative ones. Institutional factors that promote mitigative capacity include the effectiveness of government regulation, clear market rules, a skilled work force and public awareness. We briefly investigate such as high abatement cost or lack of political willingness that prevent mitigative capacity from being translated into mitigation. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.apacitation | Winkler, H., Blanchard, O., Robinson, J., Baumert, K., & Burch, S. (2007). What factors influence mitigative capacity?. <i>Energy Policy</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16812 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation | Winkler, Harald, Odile Blanchard, John Robinson, Kevin Baumert, and Sarah Burch "What factors influence mitigative capacity?." <i>Energy Policy</i> (2007) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16812 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Winkler, H; Baumert, K; Blanchard, O; Burch, S & Robinson, J. (2007) What factors influence mitigative capacity? Energy Policy 35:692–703. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 0301-4215 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris | TY - Journal Article AU - Winkler, Harald AU - Blanchard, Odile AU - Robinson, John AU - Baumert, Kevin AU - Burch, Sarah AB - This article builds on Yohe’s seminal piece on mitigative capacity, which elaborates ‘determinants’ of mitigative capacity, also reflected in the IPCC’s third assessment report. We propose a revised definition, where mitigative capacity is a country’s ability to reduce anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions or enhance natural sinks. By ‘‘ability’’ we mean skills, competencies, fitness, and proficiencies that a country has attained which can contribute to GHG emissions mitigation. A conceptual framework is proposed, linking mitigative capacity to a country’s sustainable development path, and grouping the factors influencing mitigative capacity into three main sets: economic factors, institutional ones, and technology. Both quantitative and qualitative analysis of factors is presented, showing how these factors vary across countries. We suggest that it is the interplay between the three economic factors—income, abatement cost and opportunity cost—that shape mitigative capacity. We find that income is an important economic factor influencing mitigative capacity, while abatement cost is important in turning mitigative capacity into actual mitigation. Technology is a critical mitigative capacity, including the ability to absorb existing climate-friendly technologies or to develop innovative ones. Institutional factors that promote mitigative capacity include the effectiveness of government regulation, clear market rules, a skilled work force and public awareness. We briefly investigate such as high abatement cost or lack of political willingness that prevent mitigative capacity from being translated into mitigation. DA - 2007 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town J1 - Energy Policy LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2007 SM - 0301-4215 T1 - What factors influence mitigative capacity? TI - What factors influence mitigative capacity? UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16812 ER - | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16812 | |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation | Winkler H, Blanchard O, Robinson J, Baumert K, Burch S. What factors influence mitigative capacity?. Energy Policy. 2007; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16812. | en_ZA |
dc.language | eng | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_ZA |
dc.publisher.department | Energy Research Centre | en_ZA |
dc.publisher.faculty | Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment | |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Cape Town | |
dc.source | Energy Policy | en_ZA |
dc.source.uri | http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy-policy/ | |
dc.subject.other | Sustainable development | |
dc.subject.other | Climatic changes | |
dc.subject.other | Greenhouse gas mitigation | |
dc.title | What factors influence mitigative capacity? | en_ZA |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_ZA |
uct.subject.keywords | Mitigative capacity | en_ZA |
uct.subject.keywords | Climate change | en_ZA |
uct.subject.keywords | Mitigation | en_ZA |
uct.subject.keywords | Sustainable development | en_ZA |
uct.type.filetype | Text | |
uct.type.filetype | Image | |
uct.type.publication | Research | en_ZA |
uct.type.resource | Article | en_ZA |