"limits of national amnesty legislation under international criminal law"
Thesis / Dissertation
2000
Permanent link to this Item
Authors
Supervisors
Journal Title
Link to Journal
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Publisher
University of Cape Town
Department
Faculty
License
Series
Abstract
International law traditionally refers to the actions of sovereign states as subjects of international law and thus provides no punishment for individuals. 1 It has however been established as a general rule since the Nuremberg trials2 after World War II that international law in certain cases also imposes duties and liabilities upon individuals as well as upon states. 3 The Court emphasised that violations of international law cart be committed by men and not by abstract entities. Therefore, the punishment of individuals coexists as a sanction next to the classic international liability for states for their wrongful acts. (torts and damages). The crimes individuals can be held liable for are the ones now held to be of international jurisdiction. The categories of offences were established by the Nuremberg trials, stating that war crimes, crimes against peace and crimes against humanity should be under international jurisdiction. There is, however no straightforward way in international law to deal with these issues.4 Historically, the international community taken as a whole has relied upon four alternative options for responding to such crimes.
Description
Reference:
Stoltz, A.C. 2000. "limits of national amnesty legislation under international criminal law". . University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Law ,Centre for Law and Society. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42942