Collective Climate Action, Policy Learning and COVID-19: A Comparative Analysis of the Global Governance and Responses

dc.contributor.advisorRennkamp, Britta
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Leigh-Ann
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-16T03:12:01Z
dc.date.available2022-03-16T03:12:01Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2022-03-15T23:59:46Z
dc.description.abstractThis thesis investigates the governance of two global challenges in terms of policy learning and collective action. The COVID-19 pandemic and anthropogenic climate change pose critical challenges to human well-being as much as they depend on collective responses to contain them. The comparative analysis of governance structures in climate change and the COVID-19 pandemic shows similarities and differences. A significant difference is the timing and pace of the responses: while international organisations and governments took drastic measures in response to the spread of the coronavirus, global and national responses for climate change have been comparatively slow. However, similarities emerge in the nature of the responses to these two global challenges: individual behavioural change is necessary to manage the challenges, which rarely occur without political guidance and public policy. The thesis combines the concepts of collective action and policy learning in a conceptual framework for the comparative analysis of global governance between the COVID-19 pandemic and climate change. The success of the rapid and large-scale coordinated response to the COVID-19 disease outbreak has indicated that these conceptual notions are required for global governance and that they can be harnessed on a large-scale to address a GPG or commons problem. Therefore, in order to more effectively address the GPG problem of climate change, these conceptual notions of global governance need to be harnessed not only between international organisations and governments but between governments and non-state actors. The shared policy challenges of both crises, therefore, highlight the importance of good policy design and the coordination of actors. The lessons identified can be broadly applied to the global commons problem of climate change and can help policy makers identify where enhanced policy learning and collective action is required. In particular this should be applied to coordinate policy learning and collective action from municipal to global levels and enhance the participation of the global public for long-term climate policy.
dc.identifier.apacitationPalmer, L. (2021). <i>Collective Climate Action, Policy Learning and COVID-19: A Comparative Analysis of the Global Governance and Responses</i>. (). ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Environmental and Geographical Science. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36132en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationPalmer, Leigh-Ann. <i>"Collective Climate Action, Policy Learning and COVID-19: A Comparative Analysis of the Global Governance and Responses."</i> ., ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Environmental and Geographical Science, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36132en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationPalmer, L. 2021. Collective Climate Action, Policy Learning and COVID-19: A Comparative Analysis of the Global Governance and Responses. . ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Environmental and Geographical Science. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36132en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Master Thesis AU - Palmer, Leigh-Ann AB - This thesis investigates the governance of two global challenges in terms of policy learning and collective action. The COVID-19 pandemic and anthropogenic climate change pose critical challenges to human well-being as much as they depend on collective responses to contain them. The comparative analysis of governance structures in climate change and the COVID-19 pandemic shows similarities and differences. A significant difference is the timing and pace of the responses: while international organisations and governments took drastic measures in response to the spread of the coronavirus, global and national responses for climate change have been comparatively slow. However, similarities emerge in the nature of the responses to these two global challenges: individual behavioural change is necessary to manage the challenges, which rarely occur without political guidance and public policy. The thesis combines the concepts of collective action and policy learning in a conceptual framework for the comparative analysis of global governance between the COVID-19 pandemic and climate change. The success of the rapid and large-scale coordinated response to the COVID-19 disease outbreak has indicated that these conceptual notions are required for global governance and that they can be harnessed on a large-scale to address a GPG or commons problem. Therefore, in order to more effectively address the GPG problem of climate change, these conceptual notions of global governance need to be harnessed not only between international organisations and governments but between governments and non-state actors. The shared policy challenges of both crises, therefore, highlight the importance of good policy design and the coordination of actors. The lessons identified can be broadly applied to the global commons problem of climate change and can help policy makers identify where enhanced policy learning and collective action is required. In particular this should be applied to coordinate policy learning and collective action from municipal to global levels and enhance the participation of the global public for long-term climate policy. DA - 2021_ DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town KW - Climate Change and Development LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 2021 T1 - Collective Climate Action, Policy Learning and COVID-19: A Comparative Analysis of the Global Governance and Responses TI - Collective Climate Action, Policy Learning and COVID-19: A Comparative Analysis of the Global Governance and Responses UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36132 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/36132
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationPalmer L. Collective Climate Action, Policy Learning and COVID-19: A Comparative Analysis of the Global Governance and Responses. []. ,Faculty of Science ,Department of Environmental and Geographical Science, 2021 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36132en_ZA
dc.language.rfc3066eng
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Environmental and Geographical Science
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Science
dc.subjectClimate Change and Development
dc.titleCollective Climate Action, Policy Learning and COVID-19: A Comparative Analysis of the Global Governance and Responses
dc.typeMaster Thesis
dc.type.qualificationlevelMasters
dc.type.qualificationlevelMSc
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_sci_2021_palmer leigh ann.pdf
Size:
2.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
0 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections