Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: How can we make it safer?
dc.contributor.author | Dyer, R A | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-25T09:14:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-25T09:14:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
dc.date.updated | 2015-12-24T08:21:05Z | |
dc.description.abstract | With the development of atraumatic spinal needles and the associated reduction in the incidence of post-spinal headache, spinal anaesthesia has become the favoured method of anaesthesia for caesarean section. In the UK in 2002, regional anaesthesia was employed for 95% of elective caesarean sections. Spinal anaesthesia was employed in 87% of these cases. Not only does this method avoid the problem of failed intubation, which occurs 8 times more frequently in the obstetric than the general surgical population, but other benefits include a lower morbidity, less blood loss and earlier bonding between mother and baby. | |
dc.identifier.apacitation | Dyer, R. A. (2004). Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: How can we make it safer?. <i>South African Journal Anaesthesia and Analgesia</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/21534 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation | Dyer, R A "Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: How can we make it safer?." <i>South African Journal Anaesthesia and Analgesia</i> (2004) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/21534 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Dyer, R. A. (2004). Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section: how can we make it safer?: guest editorial. Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 10(1), 5-5. | |
dc.identifier.ris | TY - Journal Article AU - Dyer, R A AB - With the development of atraumatic spinal needles and the associated reduction in the incidence of post-spinal headache, spinal anaesthesia has become the favoured method of anaesthesia for caesarean section. In the UK in 2002, regional anaesthesia was employed for 95% of elective caesarean sections. Spinal anaesthesia was employed in 87% of these cases. Not only does this method avoid the problem of failed intubation, which occurs 8 times more frequently in the obstetric than the general surgical population, but other benefits include a lower morbidity, less blood loss and earlier bonding between mother and baby. DA - 2004 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town J1 - South African Journal Anaesthesia and Analgesia LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2004 T1 - Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: How can we make it safer? TI - Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: How can we make it safer? UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/21534 ER - | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/21534 | |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation | Dyer RA. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: How can we make it safer?. South African Journal Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 2004; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/21534. | en_ZA |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher.department | Department of Anaesthesia | en_ZA |
dc.publisher.faculty | Faculty of Health Sciences | en_ZA |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Cape Town | |
dc.source | South African Journal Anaesthesia and Analgesia | |
dc.source.uri | http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ojaa20/current | |
dc.title | Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: How can we make it safer? | |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_ZA |
uct.type.filetype | Text | |
uct.type.filetype | Image | |
uct.type.publication | Research | en_ZA |
uct.type.resource | Article | en_ZA |