Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: How can we make it safer?

dc.contributor.authorDyer, R A
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-25T09:14:59Z
dc.date.available2016-08-25T09:14:59Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.date.updated2015-12-24T08:21:05Z
dc.description.abstractWith the development of atraumatic spinal needles and the associated reduction in the incidence of post-spinal headache, spinal anaesthesia has become the favoured method of anaesthesia for caesarean section. In the UK in 2002, regional anaesthesia was employed for 95% of elective caesarean sections. Spinal anaesthesia was employed in 87% of these cases. Not only does this method avoid the problem of failed intubation, which occurs 8 times more frequently in the obstetric than the general surgical population, but other benefits include a lower morbidity, less blood loss and earlier bonding between mother and baby.
dc.identifier.apacitationDyer, R. A. (2004). Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: How can we make it safer?. <i>South African Journal Anaesthesia and Analgesia</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/21534en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationDyer, R A "Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: How can we make it safer?." <i>South African Journal Anaesthesia and Analgesia</i> (2004) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/21534en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationDyer, R. A. (2004). Spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section: how can we make it safer?: guest editorial. Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 10(1), 5-5.
dc.identifier.ris TY - Journal Article AU - Dyer, R A AB - With the development of atraumatic spinal needles and the associated reduction in the incidence of post-spinal headache, spinal anaesthesia has become the favoured method of anaesthesia for caesarean section. In the UK in 2002, regional anaesthesia was employed for 95% of elective caesarean sections. Spinal anaesthesia was employed in 87% of these cases. Not only does this method avoid the problem of failed intubation, which occurs 8 times more frequently in the obstetric than the general surgical population, but other benefits include a lower morbidity, less blood loss and earlier bonding between mother and baby. DA - 2004 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town J1 - South African Journal Anaesthesia and Analgesia LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2004 T1 - Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: How can we make it safer? TI - Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: How can we make it safer? UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/21534 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/21534
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationDyer RA. Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: How can we make it safer?. South African Journal Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 2004; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/21534.en_ZA
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Anaesthesiaen_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Health Sciencesen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.sourceSouth African Journal Anaesthesia and Analgesia
dc.source.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ojaa20/current
dc.titleSpinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: How can we make it safer?
dc.typeJournal Articleen_ZA
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
uct.type.publicationResearchen_ZA
uct.type.resourceArticleen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
article_2004_dyer_r_a.pdf
Size:
39.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections