Exploring attrition bias: the case of the Khayelitsha panel study (2000-2004)
dc.contributor.author | Magruder, Jeremy | |
dc.contributor.author | Nattrass, Nicoli | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-06T08:52:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-05-06T08:52:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.date.updated | 2016-05-06T08:50:53Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Attrition bias is a problem for users of panel data. Researchers need to know what socio-economic factors are associated with attrition, and whether this is of relevance for the kind of analysis they want to conduct. This paper discusses attrition bias in the 2000/2004 Khayelitsha panel study. It shows that women, shack-dwellers and people living in smaller households are more likely to attrit, but that the impact of these variables on the probability of attrition is relatively small. The implications for labour-market analysis are then explored using Mincerian earnings functions and a probit regression on whether respondents are wage-employed or not. The coefficients generated using a restricted sample of non-attritors do not differ significantly from those generated by the entire sample. This suggests that attrition bias in this particular data set is not a problem for this kind of labour market analysis. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1813-6982.2006.00096.x | |
dc.identifier.apacitation | Magruder, J., & Nattrass, N. (2006). Exploring attrition bias: the case of the Khayelitsha panel study (2000-2004). <i>South African Journal of Economics</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19478 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation | Magruder, Jeremy, and Nicoli Nattrass "Exploring attrition bias: the case of the Khayelitsha panel study (2000-2004)." <i>South African Journal of Economics</i> (2006) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19478 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Magruder, J., & Nattrass, N. (2006). Exploring attrition bias: the case of the Khayelitsha panel study (2000‐2004). South African Journal of Economics, 74(4), 769-781. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 0038-2280 | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris | TY - Journal Article AU - Magruder, Jeremy AU - Nattrass, Nicoli AB - Attrition bias is a problem for users of panel data. Researchers need to know what socio-economic factors are associated with attrition, and whether this is of relevance for the kind of analysis they want to conduct. This paper discusses attrition bias in the 2000/2004 Khayelitsha panel study. It shows that women, shack-dwellers and people living in smaller households are more likely to attrit, but that the impact of these variables on the probability of attrition is relatively small. The implications for labour-market analysis are then explored using Mincerian earnings functions and a probit regression on whether respondents are wage-employed or not. The coefficients generated using a restricted sample of non-attritors do not differ significantly from those generated by the entire sample. This suggests that attrition bias in this particular data set is not a problem for this kind of labour market analysis. DA - 2006 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town J1 - South African Journal of Economics LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2006 SM - 0038-2280 T1 - Exploring attrition bias: the case of the Khayelitsha panel study (2000-2004) TI - Exploring attrition bias: the case of the Khayelitsha panel study (2000-2004) UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19478 ER - | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19478 | |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation | Magruder J, Nattrass N. Exploring attrition bias: the case of the Khayelitsha panel study (2000-2004). South African Journal of Economics. 2006; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19478. | en_ZA |
dc.language | eng | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_ZA |
dc.publisher.department | Centre for Social Science Research(CSSR) | en_ZA |
dc.publisher.faculty | Faculty of Humanities | en_ZA |
dc.publisher.institution | University of Cape Town | |
dc.source | South African Journal of Economics | en_ZA |
dc.source.uri | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1813-6982 | |
dc.subject.other | Attrition | |
dc.subject.other | Khayelitsha panel study | |
dc.subject.other | South Africa | |
dc.subject.other | Cape Town | |
dc.subject.other | Attrition bias | |
dc.title | Exploring attrition bias: the case of the Khayelitsha panel study (2000-2004) | en_ZA |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_ZA |
uct.type.filetype | Text | |
uct.type.filetype | Image | |
uct.type.publication | Research | en_ZA |
uct.type.resource | Article | en_ZA |