The administration of justice

dc.contributor.authorDavis, Dennis M
dc.contributor.authorMarcus, Gilbert J
dc.contributor.authorKlaaren, Jonathan E
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-17T07:18:02Z
dc.date.available2018-01-17T07:18:02Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.date.updated2017-11-16T13:48:26Z
dc.description.abstractIn the 2004 chapter on the Administration of Justice, we took the unusual step of criticising Juta, the publisher of the Annual Survey (at 823-6). We did so because we considered that Juta had behaved improperly in publishing a judgment critical of Jeremy Gauntlett SC but refusing his request to record that the Cape Bar Council had exonerated him of improper conduct. The details of the saga are fully recorded in last year's contribution and need not be repeated. As the publisher of the Annual Survey, Juta asserted a right to respond to the criticism levelled at it (2004 Annual Survey 845). Indeed, it appropriated an entire printed page to do so. Regrettably, we believe that Juta has compounded its error and that its comments cannot be allowed to stand unchallenged. In essence, Juta makes three points. First, the judgment on leave to appeal was reported because it 'contradicted a previous assumption that a dissenting judgment in the court a quo meant that leave to appeal would be granted as a matter of course' (ibid). Second, the South African Law Reports contains only such editorial comment as may be necessary to elucidate the published judgments. Third, '[i]t is not incumbent upon the publishers of law reports to annotate the reports in order to vindicate any of the persons who from time to time draw adverse comment from presiding judges' (ibid). None of these arguments withstand scrutiny.
dc.identifier.apacitationDavis, D. M., Marcus, G. J., & Klaaren, J. E. (2005). The administration of justice. <i>Annual Survey of South African Law</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/26834en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationDavis, Dennis M, Gilbert J Marcus, and Jonathan E Klaaren "The administration of justice." <i>Annual Survey of South African Law</i> (2005) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/26834en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationDavis, D. M., Marcus, G. J., & Klaaren, J. E. (2005). The Administration of Justice. Ann. Surv. S. African L., 816.
dc.identifier.ris TY - AU - Davis, Dennis M AU - Marcus, Gilbert J AU - Klaaren, Jonathan E AB - In the 2004 chapter on the Administration of Justice, we took the unusual step of criticising Juta, the publisher of the Annual Survey (at 823-6). We did so because we considered that Juta had behaved improperly in publishing a judgment critical of Jeremy Gauntlett SC but refusing his request to record that the Cape Bar Council had exonerated him of improper conduct. The details of the saga are fully recorded in last year's contribution and need not be repeated. As the publisher of the Annual Survey, Juta asserted a right to respond to the criticism levelled at it (2004 Annual Survey 845). Indeed, it appropriated an entire printed page to do so. Regrettably, we believe that Juta has compounded its error and that its comments cannot be allowed to stand unchallenged. In essence, Juta makes three points. First, the judgment on leave to appeal was reported because it 'contradicted a previous assumption that a dissenting judgment in the court a quo meant that leave to appeal would be granted as a matter of course' (ibid). Second, the South African Law Reports contains only such editorial comment as may be necessary to elucidate the published judgments. Third, '[i]t is not incumbent upon the publishers of law reports to annotate the reports in order to vindicate any of the persons who from time to time draw adverse comment from presiding judges' (ibid). None of these arguments withstand scrutiny. DA - 2005 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town J1 - Annual Survey of South African Law LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2005 T1 - The administration of justice TI - The administration of justice UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/26834 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/26834
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationDavis DM, Marcus GJ, Klaaren JE. The administration of justice. Annual Survey of South African Law. 2005; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/26834.en_ZA
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Commercial Lawen_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Lawen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.sourceAnnual Survey of South African Law
dc.source.urihttps://home.heinonline.org/titles/Law-Journal-Library/Annual-Survey-of-South-African-Law/?letter=A
dc.titleThe administration of justice
dc.typeJournal Article
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Davis_Article_2005.pdf
Size:
1.51 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections