Assessing the effects of the cone force ratio on the performance of hydrocyclones
Journal Article
2009
Permanent link to this Item
Authors
Journal Title
Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
Link to Journal
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Publisher
University of Cape Town
Department
License
Series
Abstract
Hydrocyclones are a common feature in almost all mining operations in the world, serving mainly as classifiers. Some of their advantages include low capital costs, low space requirements and their ability to reduce residence time in closed circuit grinding processes. Although an extensive body of literature exists for hydrocyclones, these devices are still inherently inefficient, and more research is currently being undertaken, particularly in the field of modelling. In the vast body of hydrocyclone literature published so far, there has been little or no effort devoted to analysing the effect of the cone force ratio on the performance of ydrocyclones. The cone force ratio is defined as the ratio of the spigot to the vortex finder diameter (Shah, 2005). In this study a total of 44 tests was carried out in a custom-built rig at the University of Cape Town. These tests were aimed at evaluating the effect of the cone force ratio on the performance of a small diameter hydrocyclone. The cut size and water split were used as the criterion for evaluating the performance of the ydrocyclone. Results from the tests showed that the cut size decreased with an increase in the cone force ratio. The cut size also appeared to decrease as the calculated locus of zero vertical velocity (LZVV) shifted inwards. The water recovery to the underflow appeared to increase with an increase in the cone force ratio. The effect on the cut size of adjusting the cone force ratio was found to be higher for a coarser feed than it was for a finer feed.
Description
Reference:
Lusinga, D., Angombe, J., & Mainza, A. N. (2009). Assessing the effects of the cone force ratio on the performance of hydrocyclones. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining & Metallurgy, 109(4), 239.