• English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse OpenUCT
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "South Africa."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Open Access
    Spatialised ecosystem modelling to evaluate the influences of marine protected areas and provisioning ecotourism on the foraging and distributional response of top predators from Mossel Bay to Algoa Bay, South Africa
    (2025) Grusd, Samantha Paige; Shannon, Lynne; Jarre, Astrid
    High trophic level ecosystem-regulating top predators are an important facet in the structure and functioning of the South-East coast of South Africa. This region is influenced by the warm, fast-flowing Agulhas Current, which make it a highly productive biodiversity hotspot. This consequently provides ideal conditions for commercial fishing, spatial management, and shark cage diving ecotourism that involves provisioning (attracting sharks to tourists); all of which have unknown implications regarding the behavioural and foraging response of top predators in the system. The Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE) and Ecospace modelling framework was utilised to investigate the distributional response of sharks and top predators on the South-East coast to the introduction of two new MPAs (in 2019) and seasonal provisioning for shark cage diving (in 2020), over a 35-year simulation period. A mass-balance Ecopath model was designed and parameterised for the 2008–2018 data period as a foundation for the spatial Ecospace models. A baseline Ecospace model was constructed, calibrated and validated against field observations to act as a reference scenario for the two exploratory models– these were i) the MPA model, which was built directly onto the baseline model and introduced the Addo Elephant National Park and Port Elizabeth (PE) Corals MPAs into the model in August 2019; and ii) the provisioning model, which built onto the MPA model, as the new shark cage diving operation in Algoa Bay occurs within the bounds of the Addo MPA. Spatial indicators (e.g., Biomass (B)mpa/Bbase, Bprovisioning/Bmpa) were calculated at various model timesteps to analyse the potential shift in top predator concentration over time and quantify their distributional response five, 15 and 25 years following the implementation of new MPAs and provisioning operation. There was a consistent distributional shift of shark and top predator concentration in response to the new MPAs and provisioning operation. Top sharks with inshore South-East coast nursery areas (smooth hammerhead, dusky, raggedtooth) and less-transient top predators (humpback dolphin, sevengill shark) evidently received positive indirect benefits of the coastal MPAs, particularly Addo (e.g., sufficient prey availability and remaining in the area for longer periods) throughout the simulation, compared to the transient top predators. This subsequently influenced the potential availability of these coastal predators for consumption by great white sharks in Algoa Bay, once seasonal provisioning was concurrently introduced to the model and white sharks became more concentrated around the Algoa Bay provisioning site. However, changes in total system biomass were minimal, and there was no indication of adverse cascading effects at the ecosystem level under current model parameterisations. Assessing the response of top predators to changes in a system is important for understanding the system's underlying dynamics, particularly in a world where the ecotourism and fishing industries are rapidly growing, and future resource management may be necessary. While previous studies have assessed various ecosystem responses to MPAs using Ecospace, this was the first study to model the ecotourism activity of shark cage diving spatially, and presents a novel approach to modelling the potential trophic effects of introducing anthropogenic activities into the marine environment.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    The determinants of divestitures and divestiture returns in South Africa
    (2019) Leepile, Katlego Joseph; Majoni, Akios
    This study investigates the determinants of divestitures, the impact of divestitures on shortterm firm value and the determinants of divestiture returns in South Africa. The study is based on a sample of 46 non-financial firms listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) between 2000 and 2014. Logit regressions found CEO Turnover, a measure of corporate focus and Return on Assets (ROA), a measure of corporate efficiency, to be the only statistically significant determinants of divestitures in South Africa. However, Sales growth, Return on Equity (ROE), Debt to Total Assets (D-t-A), Debt to Equity (D-t-E), the current ratio, and the interest coverage ratio did not possess statistical significance as determinants of divestitures in South Africa. The study also investigated the impact of divestitures on short-term shareholder wealth and found that divestitures have a statistically significant positive impact on short-term firm value in South Africa. Finally, the study also investigated the determinants of divestiture returns. Cross-sectional regressions conducted on the full sample of divesting firms found that leverage has a statistically significant effect on divestiture returns in South Africa; however, firm size and efficiency do not have a statistically significant effect on divestiture returns. In order to further understand the determinants of divestiture returns in South Africa the study also separated the portfolio of divesting firms into subsamples. The study found that larger firms report superior abnormal returns than smaller firms, firms with lower levels of efficiency report superior abnormal returns than firms with higher levels of efficiency, and highly-levered firms report superior abnormal returns than lower-levered firms in South Africa.
UCT Libraries logo

Contact us

Jill Claassen

Manager: Scholarly Communication & Publishing

Email: openuct@uct.ac.za

+27 (0)21 650 1263

  • Open Access @ UCT

    • OpenUCT LibGuide
    • Open Access Policy
    • Open Scholarship at UCT
    • OpenUCT FAQs
  • UCT Publishing Platforms

    • UCT Open Access Journals
    • UCT Open Access Monographs
    • UCT Press Open Access Books
    • Zivahub - Open Data UCT
  • Site Usage

    • Cookie settings
    • Privacy policy
    • End User Agreement
    • Send Feedback

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS