Browsing by Subject "Selectivity"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemRestrictedDoes selectivity matter? A fisheries management perspective(Elsevier, 2014) Butterworth, Doug S; Rademeyer, Rebecca A; Brandão, Anabela; Geromont, Helena F; Johnston, Susan JThe authors’ experiences in relation to the estimation of selectivity and its impact on the formulation of management advice are summarised for 14 different resources. These include instances where advice (generally in the form of a catch limit) is based on an assessment, as well as cases where a Management Procedure is developed (applying MSE) for this purpose. Relative paucity of older fish in either or both of catches or surveys is a frequent occurrence which has a number of alternative explanations, including doming in selectivity, and estimates of many biological reference points are not robustto this uncertainty. However, when the impacts of uncertainties in estimating selectivities are considered relative to those of the other uncertainties which also influence the calculation of catch limits, the former usually (although not always) seem to be of somewhat lesser importance.
- ItemRestrictedStrong-metal–support interaction by molecular design: Fe–silicate interactions in Fischer–Tropsch catalysts(Elsevier, 2012) Mogorosi, Ramoshibidu P; Fischer, Nico; Claeys, Michael; van Steen, EricMetal–support interactions in the form of iron–silicate were investigated by an inverse approach, that is, modification of nano-sized iron oxide with surface silicate groups. The presence of surface silicate groups in the calcined catalyst precursor was confirmed using diffuse reflectance infra-red Fourier transform analysis. The genesis of the various iron phases in the presence of surface silicate groups after H2-activation and the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis was followed. The surface silicate groups are preserved after a hydrogen treatment at 350 C for 16 h, and these surface ligands are associated with the residual iron oxide phase, wüstite. During the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis, a-Fe is mostly converted into v-Fe5C2, whereas FeO is the main source for e-Fe2C. The activity per unit surface area of hexagonal carbide, eFe2C, is ca. 25% higher than that of v-Fe5C2. The presence of surface silicate ligands on e-Fe2C results in a further enhancement of the rate per unit surface area of e-Fe2C by a factor of ca. 3. This is being ascribed to the enhanced availability of hydrogen on the surface due to the presence of the surface silicate groups, which also results in an increase in the methane selectivity, a decrease in the olefin content and a decrease in formation of branched product compounds.