Browsing by Subject "Ritonavir"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    The interaction between artemether-lumefantrine and lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infected patients
    (BioMed Central, 2016-01-27) Kredo, T; Mauff, K; Workman, L; Van der Walt, J S; Wiesner, L; Smith, P J; Maartens, G; Cohen, K; Barnes, K I
    Background: Artemether-lumefantrine is currently the most widely recommended treatment of uncomplicated malaria. Lopinavir–based antiretroviral therapy is the commonly recommended second-line HIV treatment. Artemether and lumefantrine are metabolised by cytochrome P450 isoenzyme CYP3A4, which lopinavir/ritonavir inhibits, potentially causing clinically important drug-drug interactions. Methods: An adaptive, parallel-design safety and pharmacokinetic study was conducted in HIV-infected (malaria-negative) patients: antiretroviral-naïve and those stable on lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretrovirals. Both groups received the recommended six-dose artemether-lumefantrine treatment. The primary outcome was day-7 lumefantrine concentrations, as these correlate with antimalarial efficacy. Adverse events were solicited throughout the study, recording the onset, duration, severity, and relationship to artemether-lumefantrine. Results: We enrolled 34 patients. Median day-7 lumefantrine concentrations were almost 10-fold higher in the lopinavir than the antiretroviral-naïve group [3170 versus 336 ng/mL; p = 0.0001], with AUC(0-inf) and Cmaxincreased five-fold [2478 versus 445 μg.h/mL; p = 0.0001], and three-fold [28.2 versus 8.8 μg/mL; p < 0.0001], respectively. Lumefantrine Cmax, and AUC(0-inf) increased significantly with mg/kg dose in the lopinavir, but not the antiretroviral-naïve group. While artemether exposure was similar between groups, Cmax and AUC(0-8h) of its active metabolite dihydroartemisinin were initially two-fold higher in the lopinavir group [p = 0.004 and p = 0.0013, respectively]. However, this difference was no longer apparent after the last artemether-lumefantrine dose. Within 21 days of starting artemether-lumefantrine there were similar numbers of treatment emergent adverse events (42 vs. 35) and adverse reactions (12 vs. 15, p = 0.21) in the lopinavir and antiretroviral-naïve groups, respectively. There were no serious adverse events and no difference in electrocardiographic QTcF- and PR-intervals, at the predicted lumefantrine Tmax. Conclusion: Despite substantially higher lumefantrine exposure, intensive monitoring in our relatively small study raised no safety concerns in HIV-infected patients stable on lopinavir-based antiretroviral therapy given the recommended artemether-lumefantrine dosage. Increased day-7 lumefantrine concentrations have been shown previously to reduce the risk of malaria treatment failure, but further evidence in adult patients co-infected with malaria and HIV is needed to assess the artemether-lumefantrine risk : benefit profile in this vulnerable population fully. Our antiretroviral-naïve patients confirmed previous findings that lumefantrine absorption is almost saturated at currently recommended doses, but this dose-limited absorption was overcome in the lopinavir group.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Sensory neuropathy and metabolic risk factors in human immune deficiency virus infected South Africans receiving protease inhibitors
    (2015) Vermaak, John-Randel; Dave, Joel A; Levitt, Naomi; Heckmann, Jeannine M
    BackgroundProtease inhibitors (PI)s have been associated with distal sensory polyneuropathy (DSP) and metabolic complications in high-income countries. No data exist in Africans where second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) often include PIs.MethodWe performed a cross-sectional study to assess the DSP frequency and metabolic risk factors in community-based South Africans taking ritonavir-boosted lopinavir as PI. Examination findings categorized subjects as having DSP (≥1 neuropathic sign) or symptomatic DSP [DSP with symptom(s)]. Fasting-state glucose and lipid profiles were assessed. We compared the ritonavir/lopinavir-group to a nested group on first-line ART [dideoxy-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (d-drugs)] selected from a dataset collected at the same time and matched for d-drug exposure.ResultsThe ritonavir/lopinavir-group (n=86) consisted predominantly of women (84%) with a median age of 36years (IQR 32–41). The median current CD4+ count was 489cells/μL (IQR 291–665). The median exposure time to ritonavir/lopinavir was 18months (IQR 10–26) and to d-drugs, 24months (IQR 16–38). DSP was present in 78% and symptomatic DSP in 48%; symptoms were most frequently of moderate intensity. Only age independently associated with DSP and symptomatic DSP (p=0.08 and p=0.04, respectively). None of the metabolic syndrome components showed associations with DSP or symptomatic DSP despite a trend towards hypertriglyceridemia overall. The ritonavir/lopinavir-group had less DSP compared to the d-drug only group (p=0.002) but the frequency of symptomatic DSP was similar (p=0.49).ConclusionRitonavir-boosted lopinavir did not add additional risk to developing DSP in this community-based African cohort after a median of 18months on second-line ART.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12981-015-0073-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    The interaction between artemether-lumefantrine and lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infected patients
    (2015) Kredo, T; Mauff, K; Workman, L; Van Der Walt, J-S; Wiesner, L; Smith, P J; Maartens, G; Cohen, K; Barnes, K I
    BackgroundArtemether-lumefantrine is currently the most widely recommended treatment of uncomplicated malaria. Lopinavir–based antiretroviral therapy is the commonly recommended second-line HIV treatment. Artemether and lumefantrine are metabolised by cytochrome P450isoenzyme CYP3A4, which lopinavir/ritonavir inhibits, potentially causing clinically important drug-drug interactions.MethodsAn adaptive, parallel-design safety and pharmacokinetic study was conducted in HIV-infected (malaria-negative) patients: antiretroviral-naïve and those stable on lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretrovirals. Both groups received the recommended six-dose artemether-lumefantrine treatment. The primary outcome was day-7 lumefantrine concentrations, as these correlate with antimalarial efficacy. Adverse events were solicited throughout the study, recording the onset, duration, severity, and relationship to artemether-lumefantrine.ResultsWe enrolled 34 patients. Median day-7 lumefantrine concentrations were almost 10-fold higher in the lopinavir than the antiretroviral-naïve group [3170 versus 336ng/mL; p = 0.0001], with AUC(0-inf) and Cmax increased five-fold [2478 versus 445μg.h/mL; p = 0.0001], and three-fold [28.2 versus 8.8μg/mL; p < 0.0001], respectively. Lumefantrine Cmax, and AUC(0-inf) increased significantly with mg/kg dose in the lopinavir, but not the antiretroviral-naïve group. While artemether exposure was similar between groups, Cmax and AUC(0-8h) of its active metabolite dihydroartemisinin were initially two-fold higher in the lopinavir group [p = 0.004 and p = 0.0013, respectively]. However, this difference was no longer apparent after the last artemether-lumefantrine dose. Within 21days of starting artemether-lumefantrine there were similar numbers of treatment emergent adverse events (42 vs. 35) and adverse reactions (12 vs. 15, p = 0.21) in the lopinavir and antiretroviral-naïve groups, respectively. There were no serious adverse events and no difference in electrocardiographic QTcF- and PR-intervals, at the predicted lumefantrine Tmax.ConclusionDespite substantially higher lumefantrine exposure, intensive monitoring in our relatively small study raised no safety concerns in HIV-infected patients stable on lopinavir-based antiretroviral therapy given the recommended artemether-lumefantrine dosage. Increased day-7 lumefantrine concentrations have been shown previously to reduce the risk of malaria treatment failure, but further evidence in adult patients co-infected with malaria and HIV is needed to assess the artemether-lumefantrine risk : benefit profile in this vulnerable population fully. Our antiretroviral-naïve patients confirmed previous findings that lumefantrine absorption is almost saturated at currently recommended doses, but this dose-limited absorption was overcome in the lopinavir group.Trial registrationClinical Trial Registration number NCT00869700. Registered on clinicaltrials.gov 25 March 2009Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1345-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.