Browsing by Subject "PICU"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    A review of the use of inhaled nitric oxide in the PICU at Red Cross Children's Hospital, 2011-2015: A retrospective cohort study
    (2019) Padayachee, Sandhia; Salie, Shamiel
    Background: Inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO) functions as a selective pulmonary vasodilator. It is an expensive treatment that is often employed as rescue therapy for refractory hypoxaemia in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pulmonary hypertension (PHT) following cardiac surgery. Objectives: To describe the response to treatment with iNO. Secondary observations were deaths, comorbidities of the patients treated, lengths of treatment and admission, and the cost of treatment. Methods: A retrospective descriptive study of all patients treated with iNO in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) at Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital (RCWMCH) from 2011- 2015. Results: A total of 140 patients were treated with iNO during this time period, 82 were for PHT following cardiac surgery, 53 for ARDS and 5 for PPHN. A response to treatment was observed in 64% of the cohort as a whole, 80% of those with PPHN, 67% of those with PHT post-cardiac surgery, and 64% of those with ARDS. A longer duration of ICU and hospital admission, and higher in hospital mortality (53%) was seen in the group with ARDS, in particular those with adenoviral infection (63%), when compared to patients treated for PHT (18%) and for PPHN (20%). There is no protocol in place guiding the use of iNO in our unit, and it was found that response to treatment was not being objectively measured and documented and that practise varied between clinicians. Conclusions: Considering the cost of treatment and lack of evidence to support beneficial effects of iNO therapy, its continued use in our resource poor setting should be guided by protocol.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Outcomes following admission to paediatric intensive care: A systematic review
    (2020) Procter, Claire; Argent, Andrew; Morrow, Brenda
    Introduction Paediatric Intensive Care has developed rapidly in recent years with a dramatic increase in survival rates. However, there are increasing concerns regarding the impact that admission to a Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) has on both the child and their family. Following discharge from PICU, children may be living with complex medical problems as well as dealing with the psychosocial impact that their illness has had on them and their family. Objectives To describe the long-term health outcomes of children admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Methods A full literature search was conducted including the databases; MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, (CENTRAL), Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, ERIC, Health Source Nursing/Academic, APA PsycInfo. All studies including children under 18 admitted to a PICU were included. Primary outcome was short- and longerterm mortality. Secondary outcomes were neurodevelopment/cognition/school performance; physical function, psychological function/behaviour impact, quality of life outcomes and social/family implications. Studies focused on Neonatal Intensive Care Admission and articles with no English translation were excluded. Results One hundred and five articles were included in the analysis. Mortality in PICU ranged from 1.3% to 50%. Mortality in high income countries reduced over time but the data did not show the same trend for low- and middle-income countries. Higher income countries were found to have lower Standardised Mortality Rates (SMRs) than low- and middle-income countries. Children had an ongoing risk of death for up to 10 years following PICU admission. Children admitted to PICU also have more ongoing morbidity than their healthy counterparts with more cognitive/developmental problems, more functional health issues, poorer quality of life as well as increased psychological problems. Their parents also have an increased risk of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Discussion Most of the studies identified are from high income countries and only include short-term follow up. More data is needed from low- and middle-income countries and over longer terms. The studies were markedly heterogenous and were all observational. Agreement is needed regarding which outcomes are most important to measure as well as standardised methods of assessing them. Further research is needed to identify the risk factors which cause children to have poorer outcomes as well as to identify predictive and modifiable factors which could be targeted in practice improvement initiatives.