• English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse OpenUCT
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "Digital health"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Digital messaging to support control for type 2 diabetes (StAR2D): a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    (2021-10-21) Farmer, A; Bobrow, K; Leon, N; Williams, N; Phiri, E; Namadingo, H; Cooper, S; Prince, J; Crampin, A; Besada, D; Daviaud, E; Yu, L-M; N’goma, J; Springer, D; Pauly, B; Tarassenko, L; Norris, S; Nyirenda, M; Levitt, N
    Background Failure to take medicines for diabetes as prescribed contributes to poor outcomes from the condition. Mobile phones are ubiquitous and short message service (SMS) texts have shown promise as a low-cost intervention. We tested the effectiveness of SMS-text messaging in improving outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods StAR2D was a 12-month two-arm randomised trial of SMS-text messaging and usual care in Cape Town, South Africa and Lilongwe, Malawi. Messages used behaviour change theory and were developed with patients and staff. The intervention group received four messages each week. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients who collected > 80% medication and changes in systolic blood pressure, lipids, cardiovascular risk, and the proportion of the participants reaching treatment goals. Results The trial took place between 1 October, 2016 and 1 October 2018, 1186 participants were randomised to intervention (593) and control (593) groups. 91% of participants completed follow-up. There was a reduction in HbA1c (DCCT) in both groups but not in mean change (95% CI) between groups (− 0.08% (− 0.31 to 0.16) (IFCC − 0.82 mmol/mol (− 3.44 to 1.79). There was a small but not significant increase in the proportions of participants likely to have collected 80% or more of medication (Relative risk 1.11 (0.84 to 1.47; P = 0.47). There was a significant difference between groups in change in systolic blood pressure from baseline of 3.46 mmHg (1.48 to 5.44, P = 0.001) in favour of the intervention group. The between group difference in change in 10-year risk of coronary heart disease was − 0.71% (− 1.46 to 0.04, P = 0.064). The proportion of participants meeting treatment goals in the intervention group was 36.0% and in the control group 26.8% (Relative risk 1.36 (1.13 to 1.63, P = 0.001). Participants reported many challenges to adherence despite finding messages acceptable and useful. Conclusions Whilst SMS text messages do not lead to improved glycaemia in these low-resource settings there appeared to be an impact on blood pressure and achievement of treatment goals but the mechanisms for this are unclear. Text messages alone, may be unsuccessful unless accompanied by health system strengthening and other forms of self-management support for type 2 diabetes. Trial registration Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN70768808. Registered 1 July 2015, http://www.isrctn.com/I ISRCTN70768808.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Digital tools for training frontline health workers in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review
    (2019) Schoeman, Fransien; Swartz, Alison; LeFevre, Amnesty
    The World Health Organization (WHO) has forecast a global shortage of health workers by 2030, predominantly affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This sits in tension with the United Nations’ (UN) Sustainable Development Goal 3 (healthy lives and well-being) through universal health coverage (UHC). To address this problem, the WHO encourages task shifting, recruitment, training, and deployment of health workers. In lowand middle-income countries (LMICs), frontline health workers (FLHWs) are responsible for expanding the reach of the health system and providing crucial reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health (RMNCH) services. Adequate and appropriate training is fundamental to the success of FLHWs, particularly in contexts where their scope of work may evolve or expand over time. Digital health solutions (defined as the use of digital, mobile and wireless technologies to support the achievement of health objectives) are increasingly being used to support the training of FLHWs. Strategies may rely on use of digital tools, including mobile phones, as the primary modality for training or as tools which augment traditional face-to-face instruction. Digital health has potential for FLHW training as it allows for listening, learning and teaching through interactive health content accessible even on basic mobile phones. This dissertation explored the literature on FLHWs in LMICs, digital health in LMICs, digital health used by FLHWs, and digital health used for training of FLHWs in LMICs. The journal “ready” component is a systematic review which discusses the various aspects of digital training for FLHWs in LMICs. For the purposes of the systematic review, seven electronic databases were searched for articles published in English from 2008-2018. Combinations of medical subheadings (MeSH) that were used were: “mHealth”, “health worker”, “community health worker” and “low- and middle-income country”. From a total of 2628 identified studies, abstracts were screened with four filters to identify studies about “training”, and eventually a total of 16 studies were included. The included studies were critically appraised and coded descriptively to enable a narrative synthesis of findings. Of the sixteen studies, twelve used mobile and/or smartphones for FLHW training. A wide range of digital platforms were used to provide information (and where relevant enable interaction). Duration of training programs varied from five days to six months. Training content was relevant to the various health services and practice areas the FLHWs worked in. Training focused on continuing education through in-service training of new content or in-service refresher courses. Three training pedagogies were used: 1) didactic training techniques – in four studies information was provided passively without an interactive component; 2) interactive training techniques – six studies used platforms to provide information along with an interactive component via multi-media; and, 3) blended-learning approach – six studies delivered training via didactic and interactive approaches by combining live and distance training. Consistent with the literature review, all studies reported increased knowledge and positive perceptions of digital health for FLHW training. Interactive and blended learning approaches, especially when accessed through mHealth technologies, are feasible, effective, appropriate, cost effective and scalable in LMICs. The conclusion from the literature and systematic reviews were that long-term effects (e.g. change in behaviour, improved service provision) need to be researched further.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Process evaluation of a brief messaging intervention to improve diabetes treatment adherence in sub-Saharan Africa
    (2021-08-21) Leon, N; Namadingo, H; Cooper, S; Bobrow, K; Mwantisi, C; Nyasulu, M; Sicwebu, N; Crampin, A; Levitt, N; Farmer, A
    Background The SMS text Adherence suppoRt for people with type 2 diabetes (StAR2D) intervention is a pragmatic randomised controlled trial, testing the effectiveness of brief text messaging for improving clinical outcomes and medication adherence. The intervention did not impact glycaemic control. We conducted a pre-and post-trial process evaluation alongside the StAR2D study in Malawi and South Africa, exploring the experiences and perceptions of patient participants, to better understand potential underlying reasons for the trial outcomes. Methods We employed a qualitative research design, including conducting semi structured in-depth interviews and focus groups at both trial sites. Purposive sampling was used to ensure representation of a wide range of patients with type 2 diabetes with regards to age, gender, ethnicity, language, and duration of diabetes. We interviewed the same participants at baseline and at the end of the trial. We used within-case and across-case thematic analysis to identify key themes. Results Brief messages delivered by text were acceptable and useful for addressing informational and support needs for participants. Some participants reported behaviour changes because of the text reminders and advice on a healthy lifestyle. Both participating in the trial and the messages were experienced as a source of support, caring, and motivation. Participants’ ability to act on the messages was limited. A common theme was frustration over the lack of ability to effectively control one’s blood glucose level. They reported a range of routinised, partial diabetes care adherence behaviours, shaped by complex and interacting individual, social, and health service factors. Participant responses and intervention impact were similar across sites, despite differences in health services. Conclusion This process evaluation provided context and insight into the factors influencing participants’ engagement with the text messaging intervention. The complex context in which patients take their diabetes medication, may explain in part, why brief text messaging may have been insufficient to bring about changes in health outcomes. The scale of need for self-management and health service support, suggests that health system strengthening, and other forms of self-management support should accompany digital communication interventions. (Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN70768808 , registered 03/08/2015.)
UCT Libraries logo

Contact us

Jill Claassen

Manager: Scholarly Communication & Publishing

Email: openuct@uct.ac.za

+27 (0)21 650 1263

  • Open Access @ UCT

    • OpenUCT LibGuide
    • Open Access Policy
    • Open Scholarship at UCT
    • OpenUCT FAQs
  • UCT Publishing Platforms

    • UCT Open Access Journals
    • UCT Open Access Monographs
    • UCT Press Open Access Books
    • Zivahub - Open Data UCT
  • Site Usage

    • Cookie settings
    • Privacy policy
    • End User Agreement
    • Send Feedback

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS