• English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse OpenUCT
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Department

Browsing by Department "Labour Enterprise Project"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Sentencing white-collar offenders: beyond a one dimensional approach
    (2009) Mellon, Allison
    The increasing prevalence of white-collar crime should prompt South African courts and legislators to consider the efficacy of sentences for these offenders. This article will define white-collar crime, discussing its theoretical ambiguities. It will then focus on the current sentencing of white-collar offenders in South Africa. A sentencing study on white-collar crime in the United States reveals that courts take account of various factors concerning the nature of the act and the actor. South African courts justify their sentencing decisions on similar factors, but also emphasise deterrence. Deterrence should not be given undue weight as the constitutional principle of proportionality must guide the courts. Imprisonment tends to be the preferred sentence for white-collar criminals, but there are constitutional, empirical and pragmatic issues with imprisonment, particularly the overcrowding of prisons. The courts should instead utilise community sentences for white-collar criminals who are not violent and can contribute their professional skills to society. South Africa requires greater resources for the administering of community sentences, and possibly, new legislation, such as the United Kingdom's Criminal Justice Act of 2003. Consideration of foreign legislation combined with increased resources would assist the effective implementation of community sentences for white-collar criminals in South Africa.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    The legal profession: Transformation and skills
    (2009) Godfrey, Shane
    It is well known that South Africa has a serious skills shortage. The new skills development dispensation introduced by the government in 1998, underpinned by the Skills Development Act, appears to have made little inroad into the shortage. The latest macroeconomic growth strategy, the Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative (Asgisa), has focused attention on skills, making the elimination of the shortage a priority in order to achieve the 6 per cent economic growth rate that it has set as a target for the country in order to halve unemployment and poverty by 2014.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Workplace forums: a critical appraisal with specific reference to section 80 (2) and 84 of the Labour Relations Act, 66 of 1995
    (1999) Musi, Cagney John; Kalula, Evance
    The interim Constitution and the final Constitution, respectively Act 200 of 1996 and Act 108 of 1996, has ushered South Africa into a new era. An era that will be characterized by it's influence on our jurisprudential, political, socio-economic and religious rights. The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 in general and workplace forums in particular ushered our labour relations into a new era. It is our attempt by the legislature to foster corporatism at the enterprise. It is hoped that workplace participatory structures such as workplace forums will lead to: Better information flow and communication between management and the workers; better decision making by management; efficiency and productivity which will help the national economy. The legislative framework that regulates the establishment of workplace forums however, present certain problems. The major obstacles that the act create is, firstly; the granting of the sole right to call for the establishment of workplace forums to majority unions (section 80(2)) and secondly; the high threshold of 100 employees that is required by section 84 of the Labour Relations Act. These provisions are critically analysed from a comparative perspective. It is argued that the high threshold is totally inexplicable and unacceptable. It is contrary to the trend in Europe where experiments with workplace based structures were highly successful. This high threshold is also totally insensitive to the needs of SMME's. It is a known fact that workers in this sector are vulnerable, exploited and deserving of legislative or other forms of protection. The introduction or legislative facilitation of the establishment of workplace forums in SMME' s has potential to serve as a counterbalancing force. By engaging management and workers in a joint forum may of the problems in SMME's can be eradicated. The position of the majority unions is also untenable. The legislature has in fact disempowered those that it seeks to empower - the workers. In most countries studied, unions not necessarily majority unions have the right to trigger the process of establishing "workplace forums." In other countries, like Germany workers that are not union members can also trigger the process. This power that is give to majority unions also further marginalises SMME's. The SMME section is not sufficiently unionised because of the organizational problems that they present. In Britain for instance, only 8% of small companies are unionised. Unions will have logistic difficulties of organising and servicing a multitude of workplaces containing relatively small numbers of members. Section 80(2) and Section 84 of the Labour Relations Act will have to be revisited with a view of making workplace forums an all inclusive process and not one dominated by majority unions. The threshold for entitlement will have to be lowered so that more employees can enjoy the potential benefits of workplace base institutions.
UCT Libraries logo

Contact us

Jill Claassen

Manager: Scholarly Communication & Publishing

Email: openuct@uct.ac.za

+27 (0)21 650 1263

  • Open Access @ UCT

    • OpenUCT LibGuide
    • Open Access Policy
    • Open Scholarship at UCT
    • OpenUCT FAQs
  • UCT Publishing Platforms

    • UCT Open Access Journals
    • UCT Open Access Monographs
    • UCT Press Open Access Books
    • Zivahub - Open Data UCT
  • Site Usage

    • Cookie settings
    • Privacy policy
    • End User Agreement
    • Send Feedback

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS