• English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse OpenUCT
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "comparison"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Comparison of estimates of left ventricular ejection fraction using gated blood imagining
    (2013) Steyn,Rachelle; acquisition; cameras; comparison; gated blood pool studies
    Serial measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (L VEF) using GBP imaging is an established technique for monitoring L VEF in patients undergoing chemotherapy with cardio-toxic medication and in patients after heart transplants. Oncologists at our institution decide that cardio-toxic chemotherapy should be discontinued if the L VEF decreases by 10%, or if a value of 50% is reached. In patients with baseline L VEFs of less than 50% but greater than 30% therapy will be discontinued if the L VEF decreases by 10% or if a value of less than 30% is reached. This is in accordance with the guidelines set out by the Oxford Textbook ofOncology.3 In patients who have had heart transplants, GBP studies are used to monitor L VEF. If there is a decrease in L VEF, cardiologists may decide to start glucocoricosteroids for rejection. It is therefore imperative that serial studies on an individual patient are comparable. There are two software systems used in our nuclear medicine department; the Siemens system and the Hermes system. In a pilot study we found large differences between the L VEFs calculated by the two systems. This is consistent with the consensus in the literature that different software programs for processing GBP studies cannot be used interchangeably.
UCT Libraries logo

Contact us

Jill Claassen

Manager: Scholarly Communication & Publishing

Email: openuct@uct.ac.za

+27 (0)21 650 1263

  • Open Access @ UCT

    • OpenUCT LibGuide
    • Open Access Policy
    • Open Scholarship at UCT
    • OpenUCT FAQs
  • UCT Publishing Platforms

    • UCT Open Access Journals
    • UCT Open Access Monographs
    • UCT Press Open Access Books
    • Zivahub - Open Data UCT
  • Site Usage

    • Cookie settings
    • Privacy policy
    • End User Agreement
    • Send Feedback

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS