• English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse OpenUCT
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Vermaak, Kelly"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Does the Nature of the Crisis Matter? A Study of Global Bank Performance during a Credit Crisis, The Debt Crisis &; Health Crisis
    (2022) Vermaak, Kelly; Charteris, Ailie
    This study examined the global performance of banks during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), the sovereign debt crisis, and COVID-19 crisis. An ordinary least squares (OLS) multiple regression model was used to observe the influence of bank specific, macroeconomic and industry related variables on global bank performance. Buy-hold-abnormal-returns (BHAR) were used as a measure of performance to assess whether the nature of the crisis mattered. A sample period of June 2007 to December 2008, May 2011 to December 2011, and 11 January 2020 to 31 May 2020 were used to represent the GFC, sovereign debt crisis, and COVID-19 crisis, respectively. Higher liquidity, loans, beta, and idiosyncratic volatility as well as a lower credit-loss ratio explained the poor performance of banks during the GFC. The negative spillover effects from the GFC significantly hindered banks' lending capacity and ability to obtain funding from the short-term market during subsequent crises. This meant lending and loans had no influence on performance during the sovereign debt crisis, evident by the insignificant relationship found. Unlike the finding for the GFC and COVID-19 crisis, both beta and idiosyncratic risk were unable to explain performance during the sovereign debt crisis. Similar to the GFC, lower loans, liquidity and credit-loss ratio helped banks achieve better returns, while greater exposure to systematic and idiosyncratic risk led to poorer performance during the COVID-19 crisis. The study further found that banks were more susceptible to the COVID-19 crisis relative to the credit crisis. Furthermore, banks in countries with a high GDP per capita and current account balance witnessed better performance during the COVID-19 crisis. Policy support and the release of Basel III, post the GFC, significantly aided in bank resilience and performance during crisis periods. However, this study found no relationship between bank share price performance and bank capital. During the COVID-19 crisis only, banks with more tangible equity earned greater returns. The policy implications of the findings highlighted how responses from previous crises ensured the financial stability of the financial system and its ability to withstand these shocks. Overall, the difference in findings across each crisis suggested that the nature of the crisis matters. Knowing the nature of the crisis and factors which influenced that particular type of crisis could help inform banks and authorities on when and how to take early precautions in the event of an approaching crisis.
UCT Libraries logo

Contact us

Jill Claassen

Manager: Scholarly Communication & Publishing

Email: openuct@uct.ac.za

+27 (0)21 650 1263

  • Open Access @ UCT

    • OpenUCT LibGuide
    • Open Access Policy
    • Open Scholarship at UCT
    • OpenUCT FAQs
  • UCT Publishing Platforms

    • UCT Open Access Journals
    • UCT Open Access Monographs
    • UCT Press Open Access Books
    • Zivahub - Open Data UCT
  • Site Usage

    • Cookie settings
    • Privacy policy
    • End User Agreement
    • Send Feedback

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS