• English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse OpenUCT
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Jones, Pete"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Open Access
    Building a Hybrid Compton Camera System for Improving Medical Imaging Applications
    (2025) Hart, Shanyn-Dee; Peterson, Steve; Jones, Pete; Pellegri, Luna
    Compton cameras present a powerful advancement in gamma-ray imaging, offering en-hanced resolution and efficiency over conventional imaging methods for medical applications such as proton therapy and other targeted radiotherapies. Unlike mechanically collimated imaging systems, a two-stage Compton camera uses a combination of scatterer and absorber detectors to reconstruct gamma-ray paths through Compton scattering events, allowing for greater flexibility in capturing images from uncollimated gamma rays. This study investi-gated the development, optimisation, and performance of three novel two-stage Compton camera prototypes designed to advance gamma-ray detection specifically for medical imag- ing applications. The prototypes — referred to as CC1, CC2, and CC3 — each featured unique configurations of scatterer and absorber detectors, tailored to explore and maximise imaging capabilities. The CC1 design integrated a hybrid setup, combining a commercial Polaris-J CZT de-tector as the scatterer layer with a 2” × 2” LaBr3:Ce detector as the absorber. CC2 and CC3 incorporated novel MacroPixel LB-14x25c-SiPM-T scintillation detector assemblies using a va-riety of different physical configurations. CC2 was evaluated for three distinct geometries, utilising a 4 × 1 matrix of detector assemblies in both the scatterer and absorber layers. Mean- while, CC3 employed a 6 × 1 matrix in the scatterer layer with a 2” × 2” LaBr3:Ce detector as the absorber. To ensure optimal performance, each detector system — including the 2” × 2” LaBr3:Ce, LaBr3:Ce and SrI2:Eu MacroPixel LB-14x25c-SiPM-T, and Polaris-J CZT detector — was char-acterised for energy resolution, detection efficiency, and timing precision prior to their use as Compton camera imaging detectors. A digital data acquisition system was used to opti-mise the energy resolution through signal shaping, achieving measurements of 4.07(9)% for the 2” × 2” LaBr3:Ce detector, 3.41(20)% and 3.82(18)% for the LaBr3:Ce and SrI2:Eu detector assemblies, respectively, and 1.38(25)% for the CZT detector at 662 keV. The fast timing capabil-ities of the 2” × 2” LaBr3:Ce detector produced an excellent timing resolution of 218.08(11) ps. Characterisation indicated that the SrI2:Eu detector, while promising in terms of energy reso-lution, experienced significant pile-up effects at close source-to-detector distance, rendering it unsuitable for Compton camera applications. The detection performance of each prototype was evaluated through TOPAS Monte Carlo simulations, validated by experimental measurements with gamma-ray sources and proton beam tests conducted at iThemba LABS in Cape Town, South Africa. The simulations were well validated in terms of full-energy peak detection efficiency and energy resolution, al-though charge build-up effects led to minor discrepancies for the CZT and SrI2:Eu detectors. Key figures of merit were chosen to be image resolution, angular resolution, and double-scatter Compton event efficiency, used to assess each Compton camera design. Image resolu-tion determines the system's ability to produce clear, spatially accurate images, essential for pinpointing gamma-ray sources in medical imaging. Angular resolution, assessed by compar-ing the angle derived from the kinematics of the Compton scattering equation with the angle reconstructed from the geometrical positions of interactions, reflects the system's ability to distinguish between gamma-ray paths and accurately resolve closely spaced sources. Lower values of angular resolution translate to sharper images with less ambiguity, enhancing di- agnostic clarity. Efficiency, defined as the fraction of detected gamma rays that contribute to image formation, influences both imaging speed and quality. An iterative three-dimensional filtered back projection method was chosen as the optimal method of image reconstruction, a technique that calculates likely gamma-ray paths and reconstructs an image by refining these projections. The results showed that CC1 achieved reasonable performance for each figure of merit; however, timing synchronisation issues limited its clinical viability. The setup of the CC1 lay-ers included a Polaris-J CZT detector with an onboard data acquisition system, which was configured to send synchronisation pulses to the absorber's data acquisition system. Mi- crosecond timing delays were encountered and were corrected extensively using background subtraction, time-walk correction, and synchronisation techniques for the data acquisition sys- tems of CC1. Ultimately, it was not possible to track double scatter Compton camera events across CC1. Although CC2 and CC3 were assessed through simulation, their figures of merit demonstrated potential for superior imaging capabilities when compared to the other designs, primarily due to their innovative configurations and timing resolution. The 4 × 2 matrix of LaBr3:Ce MacroPixel LB-14x25c-SiPM-T detector assemblies in CC2 design exhibited the greatest promise for clinical application, balancing the benefits of low-voltage operation, modular scalability and Compton camera performance. In summary, while CC1 performed strongly in simulation, CC2's optimised geometry and modular design make it a suitable candidate for further development as a high-resolution gamma-ray imaging sys-tem, particularly in advanced medical diagnostics.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Multi-photon decay mode spectroscopy of positronium
    (2022) Johnson, Storm; Leadbeater, Thomas; Jones, Pete
    An approximation for the branching ratio of the four-photon decay of parapositronium (BR4γ) was measured using a multi-gamma-ray spectrometer. For the first time in such measurements, the spectrometer consisted of an array of eight identical LaBr3:Ce scintillator detectors, each of which combines good energy resolutions (5% and 10% at 511 keV for the signals from the eighth dynode and anode of the photomultiplier tube, respectively) with an excellent timing resolution (∼ 300 ps). These energy resolutions were minimised through an optimal selection of the digital signal processing parameter settings. The detectors were situated in a planar geometry, where the source-to-detector distance of the detector system was selected such that the effect of peak pulse pile-up was minimised (to less than 3%), while maximising the full-energy peak detection efficiency at 511 keV (to 3%). For this work, locally-produced 22Na radioactive sources were used as positron emitters, which enabled the formation of positronium and subsequent gamma decays. Energy calibration measurements were performed using a 152Eu source, where the prominent energy peaks of (121.8, 244.7, 344.3, 778.9, 964.1, 1408.0) keV were used for calibration. For the BR4γ measurement, 5×1011 events were accumulated over a measurement period of 60 days, which resulted in low statistical uncertainties for the coincident counting between detector pairs (less than 1%). Through simplifying assumptions that neglected the background corrections and efficiency normalisations for each of the 2γ and 4γ decays, a first order approximation of BR4γ was determined as the ratio between measured 4γ events (N4γ) and measured 2γ events (N2γ), such that BR4γ ∼ N4γ N2γ = 4.8 (19) × 10−7. This measured value of BR4γ differs from previous measurements and accepted literature values by a factor of 3.
UCT Libraries logo

Contact us

Jill Claassen

Manager: Scholarly Communication & Publishing

Email: openuct@uct.ac.za

+27 (0)21 650 1263

  • Open Access @ UCT

    • OpenUCT LibGuide
    • Open Access Policy
    • Open Scholarship at UCT
    • OpenUCT FAQs
  • UCT Publishing Platforms

    • UCT Open Access Journals
    • UCT Open Access Monographs
    • UCT Press Open Access Books
    • Zivahub - Open Data UCT
  • Site Usage

    • Cookie settings
    • Privacy policy
    • End User Agreement
    • Send Feedback

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS