• English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse OpenUCT
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Abbas, Mumtaz"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Development, implementation and impact of Phlebotomy training on blood sample rejection and Phlebotomy knowledge of primary health care workers at selected primary health care facilities in Cape Town: a quasi-experimental study design
    (2016) Abbas, Mumtaz; Namane, Mosedi; Mukinda, Fidele Kanyimbu
    Background: There is an increasing amount of blood sample rejection at primary health care facilities (PHCFs) impacting negatively on the staff, facility, patient and laboratory costs. Aim: The primary objective was to determine the rejection rate and reasons for blood sample rejection at four PHCFs pre and post phlebotomy training. The secondary objective was to determine whether phlebotomy training improved knowledge amongst primary health care providers (HCPs) and to develop a tool for blood sample acceptability. Study Setting: Two Community Health Centres (CHCs) and two Community Day Centres (CDCs) in Cape Town. Methods: A quasi-experimental study design. Results: The sample rejection rate was 0.79% (n= 60) at CHC A, 1.13% (n= 45) at CHC B, 1.64% (n= 38) at CDC C and 1.36% (n= 8) at CDC D pre training. The rejection rates remained approximately the same post training (p>0.05). The same phlebotomy questionnaire was administered pre and post training to HCPs. The average score increased from 6 3% (95% CI 6.97 - 17.03) to 96% (95% CI 16.91 - 20.09) at CHC A (p 0.039), 58% (95% CI 9.09 – 14.91) to 93% (95% CI 17.64 – 18.76) at CHC B (p 0.006), 60% (95% CI 8.84 – 13.13) to 97% (95% CI 16.14 – 19.29) at CDC C (p 0.001) and 63% (95% CI 9.81 – 13.33) to 97% (95% CI 18.08 – 19.07) at CDC D (p 0.001). Conclusion: There is no statistically significant improvement in the rejection rate of blood samples (p>0.05) post training despite knowledge improving in all HCPs (p <0.05).
UCT Libraries logo

Contact us

Jill Claassen

Manager: Scholarly Communication & Publishing

Email: openuct@uct.ac.za

+27 (0)21 650 1263

  • Open Access @ UCT

    • OpenUCT LibGuide
    • Open Access Policy
    • Open Scholarship at UCT
    • OpenUCT FAQs
  • UCT Publishing Platforms

    • UCT Open Access Journals
    • UCT Open Access Monographs
    • UCT Press Open Access Books
    • Zivahub - Open Data UCT
  • Site Usage

    • Cookie settings
    • Privacy policy
    • End User Agreement
    • Send Feedback

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS