Key ethical issues encountered during COVID-19 research: a thematic analysis of perspectives from South African research ethics committees

 

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Burgess, Theresa
dc.contributor.author Rennie, Stuart
dc.contributor.author Moodley, Keymanthri
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-10T06:35:37Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-10T06:35:37Z
dc.date.issued 2023-02-15
dc.identifier.citation Burgess, T., Rennie, S. & Moodley, K. 2023. Key ethical issues encountered during COVID-19 research: a thematic analysis of perspectives from South African research ethics committees. <i>BMC Medical Ethics.</i> 24(1):11. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37348 en_ZA
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00888-y
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37348
dc.description.abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic presents significant challenges to research ethics committees (RECs) in balancing urgency of review of COVID-19 research with careful consideration of risks and benefits. In the African context, RECs are further challenged by historical mistrust of research and potential impacts on COVID-19 related research participation, as well as the need to facilitate equitable access to effective treatments or vaccines for COVID-19. In South Africa, an absent National Health Research Ethics Council (NHREC) also left RECs without national guidance for a significant duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a qualitative descriptive study that explored the perspectives and experiences of RECs regarding the ethical challenges of COVID-19 research in South Africa. Methods We conducted in-depth interviews with 21 REC chairpersons or members from seven RECs at large academic health institutions across South Africa that were actively involved in the review of COVID-19 related research from January to April 2021. In-depth interviews were conducted remotely via Zoom. Interviews (60–125 min) were conducted in English using an in-depth interview guide, until data saturation was achieved. Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim and field notes were converted into data documents. Line-by-line coding of transcripts was performed, and data were organised into themes and sub-themes. An inductive approach to thematic analysis was used to analyse data. Results Five main themes were identified, namely: rapidly evolving research ethics landscape, extreme vulnerability of research participants, unique challenges to informed consent, challenges to community engagement during COVID-19, and overlapping research ethics and public health equity issues. Sub-themes were identified for each main theme. Conclusions Numerous, significant ethical complexities and challenges were identified by South African REC members in the review of COVID-19 related research. While RECs are resilient and adaptable, reviewer and REC member fatigue were major concerns. The numerous ethical issues identified also highlight the need for research ethics teaching and training, especially in informed consent, as well as the urgent requirement for the development of national guidelines for research ethics during public health emergencies. Further, comparative analysis between different countries is needed to develop the discourse around African RECs and COVID-19 research ethics issues. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ en_US
dc.source BMC Medical Ethics en_US
dc.source.uri https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/
dc.subject Research ethics committees en_US
dc.subject COVID-19 en_US
dc.subject Pandemic en_US
dc.subject Public health emergency en_US
dc.subject Research ethics en_US
dc.title Key ethical issues encountered during COVID-19 research: a thematic analysis of perspectives from South African research ethics committees en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.date.updated 2023-02-19T05:25:07Z
dc.language.rfc3066 en
dc.rights.holder The Author(s)
dc.publisher.faculty Faculty of Health Sciences en_US
dc.publisher.department Division of Physiotherapy en_US
dc.source.journalvolume 24 en_US
dc.source.journalissue 1 en_US
dc.source.pagination 11 en_US
dc.identifier.apacitation Burgess, T., Rennie, S., & Moodley, K. (2023). Key ethical issues encountered during COVID-19 research: a thematic analysis of perspectives from South African research ethics committees. <i>BMC Medical Ethics</i>, 24(1), 11. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37348 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Burgess, Theresa, Stuart Rennie, and Keymanthri Moodley "Key ethical issues encountered during COVID-19 research: a thematic analysis of perspectives from South African research ethics committees." <i>BMC Medical Ethics</i> 24, 1. (2023): 11. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37348 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Burgess T, Rennie S, Moodley K. Key ethical issues encountered during COVID-19 research: a thematic analysis of perspectives from South African research ethics committees. BMC Medical Ethics. 2023;24(1):11. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37348. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Journal Article AU - Burgess, Theresa AU - Rennie, Stuart AU - Moodley, Keymanthri AB - Background The COVID-19 pandemic presents significant challenges to research ethics committees (RECs) in balancing urgency of review of COVID-19 research with careful consideration of risks and benefits. In the African context, RECs are further challenged by historical mistrust of research and potential impacts on COVID-19 related research participation, as well as the need to facilitate equitable access to effective treatments or vaccines for COVID-19. In South Africa, an absent National Health Research Ethics Council (NHREC) also left RECs without national guidance for a significant duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a qualitative descriptive study that explored the perspectives and experiences of RECs regarding the ethical challenges of COVID-19 research in South Africa. Methods We conducted in-depth interviews with 21 REC chairpersons or members from seven RECs at large academic health institutions across South Africa that were actively involved in the review of COVID-19 related research from January to April 2021. In-depth interviews were conducted remotely via Zoom. Interviews (60–125 min) were conducted in English using an in-depth interview guide, until data saturation was achieved. Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim and field notes were converted into data documents. Line-by-line coding of transcripts was performed, and data were organised into themes and sub-themes. An inductive approach to thematic analysis was used to analyse data. Results Five main themes were identified, namely: rapidly evolving research ethics landscape, extreme vulnerability of research participants, unique challenges to informed consent, challenges to community engagement during COVID-19, and overlapping research ethics and public health equity issues. Sub-themes were identified for each main theme. Conclusions Numerous, significant ethical complexities and challenges were identified by South African REC members in the review of COVID-19 related research. While RECs are resilient and adaptable, reviewer and REC member fatigue were major concerns. The numerous ethical issues identified also highlight the need for research ethics teaching and training, especially in informed consent, as well as the urgent requirement for the development of national guidelines for research ethics during public health emergencies. Further, comparative analysis between different countries is needed to develop the discourse around African RECs and COVID-19 research ethics issues. DA - 2023-02-15 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town IS - 1 J1 - BMC Medical Ethics KW - Research ethics committees KW - COVID-19 KW - Pandemic KW - Public health emergency KW - Research ethics LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PY - 2023 T1 - Key ethical issues encountered during COVID-19 research: a thematic analysis of perspectives from South African research ethics committees TI - Key ethical issues encountered during COVID-19 research: a thematic analysis of perspectives from South African research ethics committees UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37348 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/