Since this request appeared rooted in reviewer concerns about selectivity doming, to assist assess the trade-offs involved, another variant of the preferred Reference Case (RC), which is named RCvar3, has been added. This is exactly as the RC, but with both flat survey and flat fishery selectivities at large ages.
Reference:
Butterworth, D.S. and Rademeyer, R.A. 2016. Response to reviewer requests in regard to the impact of selectivity doming in the preferred SCAA model. Document submitted to the NEFSC Witch Flounder SARC meeting, Woods Hole, 29 November – 2 December 2016: 4pp.
Butterworth, D. S., & Rademeyer, R. A. (2016). Response to reviewer requests in regard to the impact of selectivity doming in the preferred SCAA model University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Marine Resource Assessment and Management Group. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/24029
Butterworth, Doug S, and Rebecca A Rademeyer Response to reviewer requests in regard to the impact of selectivity doming in the preferred SCAA model. University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Marine Resource Assessment and Management Group, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/24029
Butterworth DS, Rademeyer RA. Response to reviewer requests in regard to the impact of selectivity doming in the preferred SCAA model. 2016 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/24029
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)