Feeling the Hawks: Why an anti-corruption agency should not be in the SAPS

 

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kinnes, Irvin
dc.contributor.author Newham, Gareth
dc.date.accessioned 2016-04-05T08:32:49Z
dc.date.available 2016-04-05T08:32:49Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2413-3108/2012/v0i39a846
dc.identifier.citation Kinnes, I., & Newham, G. (2012). Freeing the Hawks: why an anti-corruption agency should not be in the SAPS. SA Crime Quarterly, (39), 33-39. en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn 2413-3108 en_ZA
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11427/18544
dc.identifier.uri http://journals.assaf.org.za/index.php/sacq/article/view/846
dc.description.abstract The Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI), commonly known as the ‘Hawks’, is currently at a crossroads. The Constitutional Court judgment in Glenister vs the President of South Africa and Others has called into question the Directorate’s continued existence in its current form. One of the most important questions raised by the Constitutional Court judgment is whether the DPCI can be sufficiently independent while located within the SAPS. This article presents arguments in support of the view that separating the unit from the SAPS is essential to build public confidence in the unit and to meet the requirements of the judgment. en_ZA
dc.language eng en_ZA
dc.publisher Academy of Science of South Africa en_ZA
dc.rights Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ en_ZA
dc.source South African Crime Quarterly en_ZA
dc.source.uri http://journals.assaf.org.za/index.php/sacq
dc.subject.other corruption
dc.subject.other Hawks
dc.subject.other South Africa
dc.subject.other Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation
dc.subject.other independance
dc.subject.other SAPS
dc.title Feeling the Hawks: Why an anti-corruption agency should not be in the SAPS en_ZA
dc.type Journal Article en_ZA
dc.date.updated 2016-04-05T08:31:07Z
uct.type.publication Research en_ZA
uct.type.resource Article en_ZA
dc.publisher.institution University of Cape Town
dc.publisher.faculty Faculty of Law en_ZA
dc.publisher.department Institute of Criminology en_ZA
uct.type.filetype Text
uct.type.filetype Image
dc.identifier.apacitation Kinnes, I., & Newham, G. (2012). Feeling the Hawks: Why an anti-corruption agency should not be in the SAPS. <i>South African Crime Quarterly</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/18544 en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitation Kinnes, Irvin, and Gareth Newham "Feeling the Hawks: Why an anti-corruption agency should not be in the SAPS." <i>South African Crime Quarterly</i> (2012) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/18544 en_ZA
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation Kinnes I, Newham G. Feeling the Hawks: Why an anti-corruption agency should not be in the SAPS. South African Crime Quarterly. 2012; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/18544. en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Journal Article AU - Kinnes, Irvin AU - Newham, Gareth AB - The Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI), commonly known as the ‘Hawks’, is currently at a crossroads. The Constitutional Court judgment in Glenister vs the President of South Africa and Others has called into question the Directorate’s continued existence in its current form. One of the most important questions raised by the Constitutional Court judgment is whether the DPCI can be sufficiently independent while located within the SAPS. This article presents arguments in support of the view that separating the unit from the SAPS is essential to build public confidence in the unit and to meet the requirements of the judgment. DA - 2012 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town J1 - South African Crime Quarterly LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2012 SM - 2413-3108 T1 - Feeling the Hawks: Why an anti-corruption agency should not be in the SAPS TI - Feeling the Hawks: Why an anti-corruption agency should not be in the SAPS UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/18544 ER - en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)