JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

- OpenUCT Home
- →
- Other Publications
- →
- Working Papers
- →
- View Item

dc.contributor.author | Plagányi, Éva E | |

dc.date.accessioned | 2016-03-18T11:47:17Z | |

dc.date.available | 2016-03-18T11:47:17Z | |

dc.date.issued | 2008 | |

dc.identifier.citation | Plagányi, É. (2008). Reference-case 2008 assessment model for abalone in Zones A, B, C and D. | en_ZA |

dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17997 | |

dc.description.abstract | A summary is presented of the results obtained from the 2008 Reference-case model and two variants that was fit to Zones A, B, CNP, CP and D in combination (hereafter referred to as the “combined ABCD model”). The full details of the spatial- and age-structured production model (ASPM) are provided in Appendices 1 and 2. The 2008 base-case model uses an updated CPUPE index, and differs from last year’s base-case in estimating one more parameter for Zone A (the historic catch multiplier). The three model versions presented in Table 1 are as follows: Model a) Concern was expressed by the AWG that the CPUPE trend for Zone B declines too steeply in recent years. This may be attributable to an incorrect partitioning of confiscated abalone between Zones A and B. Rather than estimating the amount poached in Zone B in recent years, this model combines the estimates of the amount poached from Zones A and B and then estimates a parameter that describes the proportion of this total that is taken from Zone A versus Zone B from 2000 onwards. The model estimated proportion poached from Zone A is 0.65 [90% Hessian-based confidence interval 0.55 – 0.75. This model version has been refined slightly from a preliminary version presented to the AWG in that parameter estimates for Zone A now result in an improved fit. Model b) The old Reference case model is similar but estimates the Zone B poaching amount (in numbers), that is assume to apply from 2005-2008. Model c) This model version used a single compartment per zone, rather than assuming inshore and offshore model regions. This model had the worst AIC value. The new Reference Case Model estimates a pristine spawning biomass, (in tonnes) with 90% Hessian-based confidence intervals shown in square brackets, of 9760 [6060; 13460], 5840 [5400; 6280], 7290 [7050; 7530] and 9650 [6440; 12850] for Zones A, B, C and D respectively. The current (inshore+offshore) spawning biomasses (and associated 90% confidence intervals) of abalone in Zones A, B, C and D are estimated at ca. 33 % [26%; 39%], 25 % [19%; 30%], 4% [1%; 6%] and 12 % [8%; 16%] respectively of their preexploitation levels. The “nonpoached” CNP and “poached” CP areas of Zone C are estimated at ca. 6 % and 3 % respectively with the inshore region particularly depleted: the model predicts zero remaining abalone in the inshore CNP, CP and Zone D areas. Equivalent estimates for Zones A and B are 21% and 22%. Natural mortality is reasonably estimated (e.g. 0.33 yr-1 for age 0 and 0.14 yr-1 for age 15+) and in Zones C and D, the additional Bsp 0 mortality estimated for 0-yr old abalone (due to the ecosystem-change effect) corresponds to near zero current annual survival rates. Poaching is severely impacting the resource, with Zone A particularly impacted in recent years. The combined Zones A-D model-predicted 2008 poaching estimate is 860 MT and corresponds to the assumption that, on average, 14% of all poached abalone are confiscated. | en_ZA |

dc.language | eng | en_ZA |

dc.subject.other | Reference-case 2008 assessment mode | |

dc.subject.other | Abalone | |

dc.title | Reference-case 2008 assessment model for abalone in Zones A, B, C and D | en_ZA |

dc.type | Working Paper | en_ZA |

dc.date.updated | 2016-03-18T11:44:14Z | |

uct.type.publication | Research | en_ZA |

uct.type.resource | Research paper | en_ZA |

dc.publisher.institution | University of Cape Town | |

dc.publisher.faculty | Faculty of Science | en_ZA |

dc.publisher.department | Marine Resource Assessment and Management Group | en_ZA |

uct.type.filetype | Text | |

dc.identifier.apacitation | Plagányi, É. E. (2008). <i>Reference-case 2008 assessment model for abalone in Zones A, B, C and D</i> University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Marine Resource Assessment and Management Group. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17997 | en_ZA |

dc.identifier.chicagocitation | Plagányi, Éva E <i>Reference-case 2008 assessment model for abalone in Zones A, B, C and D.</i> University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Marine Resource Assessment and Management Group, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17997 | en_ZA |

dc.identifier.vancouvercitation | Plagányi ÉE. Reference-case 2008 assessment model for abalone in Zones A, B, C and D. 2008 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17997 | en_ZA |

dc.identifier.ris | TY - Working Paper AU - Plagányi, Éva E AB - A summary is presented of the results obtained from the 2008 Reference-case model and two variants that was fit to Zones A, B, CNP, CP and D in combination (hereafter referred to as the “combined ABCD model”). The full details of the spatial- and age-structured production model (ASPM) are provided in Appendices 1 and 2. The 2008 base-case model uses an updated CPUPE index, and differs from last year’s base-case in estimating one more parameter for Zone A (the historic catch multiplier). The three model versions presented in Table 1 are as follows: Model a) Concern was expressed by the AWG that the CPUPE trend for Zone B declines too steeply in recent years. This may be attributable to an incorrect partitioning of confiscated abalone between Zones A and B. Rather than estimating the amount poached in Zone B in recent years, this model combines the estimates of the amount poached from Zones A and B and then estimates a parameter that describes the proportion of this total that is taken from Zone A versus Zone B from 2000 onwards. The model estimated proportion poached from Zone A is 0.65 [90% Hessian-based confidence interval 0.55 – 0.75. This model version has been refined slightly from a preliminary version presented to the AWG in that parameter estimates for Zone A now result in an improved fit. Model b) The old Reference case model is similar but estimates the Zone B poaching amount (in numbers), that is assume to apply from 2005-2008. Model c) This model version used a single compartment per zone, rather than assuming inshore and offshore model regions. This model had the worst AIC value. The new Reference Case Model estimates a pristine spawning biomass, (in tonnes) with 90% Hessian-based confidence intervals shown in square brackets, of 9760 [6060; 13460], 5840 [5400; 6280], 7290 [7050; 7530] and 9650 [6440; 12850] for Zones A, B, C and D respectively. The current (inshore+offshore) spawning biomasses (and associated 90% confidence intervals) of abalone in Zones A, B, C and D are estimated at ca. 33 % [26%; 39%], 25 % [19%; 30%], 4% [1%; 6%] and 12 % [8%; 16%] respectively of their preexploitation levels. The “nonpoached” CNP and “poached” CP areas of Zone C are estimated at ca. 6 % and 3 % respectively with the inshore region particularly depleted: the model predicts zero remaining abalone in the inshore CNP, CP and Zone D areas. Equivalent estimates for Zones A and B are 21% and 22%. Natural mortality is reasonably estimated (e.g. 0.33 yr-1 for age 0 and 0.14 yr-1 for age 15+) and in Zones C and D, the additional Bsp 0 mortality estimated for 0-yr old abalone (due to the ecosystem-change effect) corresponds to near zero current annual survival rates. Poaching is severely impacting the resource, with Zone A particularly impacted in recent years. The combined Zones A-D model-predicted 2008 poaching estimate is 860 MT and corresponds to the assumption that, on average, 14% of all poached abalone are confiscated. DA - 2008 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2008 T1 - Reference-case 2008 assessment model for abalone in Zones A, B, C and D TI - Reference-case 2008 assessment model for abalone in Zones A, B, C and D UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17997 ER - | en_ZA |