This year these awards take place at a crucial moment in the development of our constitutional democracy. Such a democracy can flourish only where there exists a basic, shared normative framework upon which the practice of a constitution can be built. Expressed bluntly, where a community cannot establish the most rudimentary of overlapping consensus as to basic values, there can be no long-term future for a constitutional community. If we, as the citizenry, cannot agree about a core meaning of freedom, equality, dignity, democracy, accountability, transparency and integrity, then our constitution will remain a text with no more significance than a document of historical curiosity. John Rawls Political Liberalism (1993) understood this requirement well: he sought not the creation of firm agreements on a comprehensive conception of the good. Rather, he insisted that without agreement on a core set of principles of justice, liberal democracy was not possible.
Reference:
Davis, D. (2008). The gap between constitutional text and social practice: the role of the press: notes. South African Law Journal, 125(2), 213-216.
Davis, D. (2008). The Gap Between Constitutional Text and Social Practice: The Role of the Press. South African Law Journal, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16499
Davis, Dennis "The Gap Between Constitutional Text and Social Practice: The Role of the Press." South African Law Journal (2008) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16499
Davis D. The Gap Between Constitutional Text and Social Practice: The Role of the Press. South African Law Journal. 2008; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16499.