Clinical predictors of outcome in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Journal Article
2003
Permanent link to this Item
Authors
Journal Title
South African Medical Journal
Link to Journal
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Health and Medical Publishing Group
Publisher
University of Cape Town
Department
Faculty
Series
Abstract
Objective: Endoscopy has traditionally been used to risk-stratify patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). This is problematic in resource-poor environments. The study aimed to identify patients who would not require urgent endoscopy by identifying clinical variables before endoscopy that predict uneventful recovery. Design: Prospective, descriptive cross-sectional study. Setting. Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town. Subjects: Two hundred consecutive patients aged over 12 years, presenting with haematemesis and/or melaena. Outcome measures: Good outcome, i.e. no blood transfusion, endotherapy or surgery, and alive at 1 month following presentation. Results: Eighty patients (40%) had a good outcome. Haemoglobin > 10 g/dl (odds ratio (OR) 25.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.9 - 74.8; p < 0.001), absence of melaena (OR 4.8, 95% CI: 1.79 - 12.94, p = 0.002) and absence of syncope (OR 4.0, 95% CI: 1.67 - 9.48; p = 0.002) were independent predictors of good outcome. The three variables combined as a positive test had the best association with good outcome when compared with a single variable or a combination of two variables. The three-variable model had sensitivity for good outcome of 34%, specificity of 98%, and likelihood ratio for a positive test of 13.5 and for a negative test of 0.68. Thirty patients (15%) had the combination for the prediction rule, i.e. haemoglobin > 10 g/dl, no melaena and no syncope; 3 (10%) had a poor outcome (required endotherapy). Conclusion: The prediction rule accurately excluded poor outcome, a priority in the clinical context, but did not predict good outcome. Clinical implications are a 15% reduction in unnecessary urgent endoscopies, with less than 5% of patients with poor outcome not undergoing urgent endoscopy. These findings may have particular clinical relevance in under-resourced health care environments.
Description
Reference:
Kalula, S. Z., Swingler, G. H., & Louw, J. A. (2003). Clinical predictors of outcome in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: original article. South African Medical Journal, 93(4), p-286.