Recent court judgements on the meaning of "gross irregularity" in terms of Section 33 of the South African Arbitration Act

 

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Rycroft, Alan en_ZA
dc.contributor.author Jwaai, Abongile Asanda en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned 2015-05-27T04:07:15Z
dc.date.available 2015-05-27T04:07:15Z
dc.date.issued 2014 en_ZA
dc.identifier.citation Jwaai, A. 2014. Recent court judgements on the meaning of "gross irregularity" in terms of Section 33 of the South African Arbitration Act. University of Cape Town. en_ZA
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12897
dc.description Includes bibliographical references. en_ZA
dc.description.abstract This dissertation investigates the way courts have interpreted the limited grounds of review, in particular ‘gross irregularity’, evaluating the test for review, and assessing the extent to which they have been consistent in their approach to review. en_ZA
dc.language.iso eng en_ZA
dc.subject.other Commercial Law en_ZA
dc.title Recent court judgements on the meaning of "gross irregularity" in terms of Section 33 of the South African Arbitration Act en_ZA
dc.type Thesis / Dissertation en_ZA
uct.type.publication Research en_ZA
uct.type.resource Thesis en_ZA
dc.publisher.institution University of Cape Town
dc.publisher.faculty Faculty of Law en_ZA
dc.publisher.department Department of Commercial Law en_ZA
dc.type.qualificationlevel Postgraduate Diploma en_ZA
dc.type.qualificationname PGDip en_ZA
uct.type.filetype Text
uct.type.filetype Image


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record