dc.contributor.author |
Chapman, Kenneth R
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Beeh, Kai-Michael
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Beier, Jutta
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Bateman, Eric D
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
D’Urzo, Anthony
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Nutbrown, Robert
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Henley, Michelle
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Chen, Hungta
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Overend, Tim
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
D’Andrea, Peter
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-03-04T09:48:13Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-03-04T09:48:13Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2014-01-17 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Chapman, K. R., Beeh, K. M., Beier, J., Bateman, E. D., D’Urzo, A., Nutbrown, R., ... and D’Andrea, P. (2014). A blinded evaluation of the efficacy and safety of glycopyrronium, a once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist, versus tiotropium, in patients with COPD: the GLOW5 study. BMC pulmonary medicine, 14(1), 4. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn |
1471-2466 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12553
|
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-14-4
|
|
dc.description.abstract |
Abstract
Background
Two once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) are currently available for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) – tiotropium and glycopyrronium. Previous studies have compared glycopyrronium with open-label tiotropium. In the GLOW5 study, we compare glycopyrronium with blinded tiotropium.
Methods
In this blinded, double-dummy, parallel group, 12-week study, patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomized 1:1 to glycopyrronium 50 μg once daily or tiotropium 18 μg once daily. The primary objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of glycopyrronium versus blinded tiotropium with respect to trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) following 12 weeks of treatment (non-inferiority margin: –50 mL). Secondary objectives were to evaluate glycopyrronium versus tiotropium for other spirometric outcomes, breathlessness (Transition Dyspnea Index; TDI), health status (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire; SGRQ), daily rescue medication use, COPD exacerbations and COPD symptoms over 12 weeks of treatment.
Results
657 patients were randomized (glycopyrronium: 327; tiotropium: 330); 96% (630 patients) completed the study. Least squares mean trough FEV1 for both glycopyrronium and tiotropium was 1.405 L at Week 12, meeting the criterion for non-inferiority (mean treatment difference: 0 mL, 95% CI: –32, 31 mL). Glycopyrronium demonstrated rapid bronchodilation following first dose on Day 1, with significantly higher FEV1 at all time points from 0–4 h post-dose versus tiotropium (all p < 0.001). FEV1 area under the curve from 0–4 h (AUC0–4h) post-dose with glycopyrronium was significantly superior to tiotropium on Day 1 (p < 0.001) and was comparable to tiotropium at Week 12. Glycopyrronium demonstrated comparable improvements to tiotropium in TDI focal score, SGRQ total score, rescue medication use and the rate of COPD exacerbations (all p = not significant). Patients on glycopyrronium also had a significantly lower total COPD symptom score versus patients on tiotropium after 12 weeks (p = 0.035). Adverse events were reported by a similar percentage of patients receiving glycopyrronium (40.4%) and tiotropium (40.6%).
Conclusion
In patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, 12-week blinded treatment with once-daily glycopyrronium 50 μg or tiotropium 18 μg, provided similar efficacy and safety, with glycopyrronium having a faster onset of action on Day 1 versus tiotropium.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrial.gov,
NCT01613326 |
en_ZA |
dc.language |
eng |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher |
BioMed Central |
en_ZA |
dc.rights |
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) |
* |
dc.rights.uri |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
en_ZA |
dc.source |
BMC Pulmonary Medicine |
en_ZA |
dc.source.uri |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpulmmed/
|
|
dc.subject.other |
COPD |
en_ZA |
dc.subject.other |
Glycopyrronium |
en_ZA |
dc.subject.other |
Breezhaler |
en_ZA |
dc.subject.other |
Tiotropium |
en_ZA |
dc.title |
A blinded evaluation of the efficacy and safety of glycopyrronium, a once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist, versus tiotropium, in patients with COPD: the GLOW5 study |
en_ZA |
dc.type |
Journal Article |
en_ZA |
dc.date.updated |
2015-01-15T17:52:35Z |
|
dc.language.rfc3066 |
en |
|
dc.rights.holder |
Chapman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
|
uct.type.publication |
Research |
en_ZA |
uct.type.resource |
Article
|
en_ZA |
dc.publisher.institution |
University of Cape Town |
|
dc.publisher.faculty |
Faculty of Health Sciences |
en_ZA |
dc.publisher.department |
Department of Medicine |
en_ZA |
uct.type.filetype |
Text |
|
uct.type.filetype |
Image |
|
dc.identifier.apacitation |
Chapman, K. R., Beeh, K., Beier, J., Bateman, E. D., , Nutbrown, R., ... (2014). A blinded evaluation of the efficacy and safety of glycopyrronium, a once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist, versus tiotropium, in patients with COPD: the GLOW5 study. <i>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12553 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.chicagocitation |
Chapman, Kenneth R, Kai-Michael Beeh, Jutta Beier, Eric D Bateman, , Robert Nutbrown, Michelle Henley, Hungta Chen, Tim Overend, and "A blinded evaluation of the efficacy and safety of glycopyrronium, a once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist, versus tiotropium, in patients with COPD: the GLOW5 study." <i>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</i> (2014) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12553 |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.vancouvercitation |
Chapman KR, Beeh K, Beier J, Bateman ED, , Nutbrown R, et al. A blinded evaluation of the efficacy and safety of glycopyrronium, a once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist, versus tiotropium, in patients with COPD: the GLOW5 study. BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 2014; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12553. |
en_ZA |
dc.identifier.ris |
TY - Journal Article
AU - Chapman, Kenneth R
AU - Beeh, Kai-Michael
AU - Beier, Jutta
AU - Bateman, Eric D
AU - D’Urzo, Anthony
AU - Nutbrown, Robert
AU - Henley, Michelle
AU - Chen, Hungta
AU - Overend, Tim
AU - D’Andrea, Peter
AB - Abstract
Background
Two once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) are currently available for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) – tiotropium and glycopyrronium. Previous studies have compared glycopyrronium with open-label tiotropium. In the GLOW5 study, we compare glycopyrronium with blinded tiotropium.
Methods
In this blinded, double-dummy, parallel group, 12-week study, patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomized 1:1 to glycopyrronium 50 μg once daily or tiotropium 18 μg once daily. The primary objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of glycopyrronium versus blinded tiotropium with respect to trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) following 12 weeks of treatment (non-inferiority margin: –50 mL). Secondary objectives were to evaluate glycopyrronium versus tiotropium for other spirometric outcomes, breathlessness (Transition Dyspnea Index; TDI), health status (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire; SGRQ), daily rescue medication use, COPD exacerbations and COPD symptoms over 12 weeks of treatment.
Results
657 patients were randomized (glycopyrronium: 327; tiotropium: 330); 96% (630 patients) completed the study. Least squares mean trough FEV1 for both glycopyrronium and tiotropium was 1.405 L at Week 12, meeting the criterion for non-inferiority (mean treatment difference: 0 mL, 95% CI: –32, 31 mL). Glycopyrronium demonstrated rapid bronchodilation following first dose on Day 1, with significantly higher FEV1 at all time points from 0–4 h post-dose versus tiotropium (all p < 0.001). FEV1 area under the curve from 0–4 h (AUC0–4h) post-dose with glycopyrronium was significantly superior to tiotropium on Day 1 (p < 0.001) and was comparable to tiotropium at Week 12. Glycopyrronium demonstrated comparable improvements to tiotropium in TDI focal score, SGRQ total score, rescue medication use and the rate of COPD exacerbations (all p = not significant). Patients on glycopyrronium also had a significantly lower total COPD symptom score versus patients on tiotropium after 12 weeks (p = 0.035). Adverse events were reported by a similar percentage of patients receiving glycopyrronium (40.4%) and tiotropium (40.6%).
Conclusion
In patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, 12-week blinded treatment with once-daily glycopyrronium 50 μg or tiotropium 18 μg, provided similar efficacy and safety, with glycopyrronium having a faster onset of action on Day 1 versus tiotropium.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrial.gov,
NCT01613326
DA - 2014-01-17
DB - OpenUCT
DO - 10.1186/1471-2466-14-4
DP - University of Cape Town
J1 - BMC Pulmonary Medicine
LK - https://open.uct.ac.za
PB - University of Cape Town
PY - 2014
SM - 1471-2466
T1 - A blinded evaluation of the efficacy and safety of glycopyrronium, a once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist, versus tiotropium, in patients with COPD: the GLOW5 study
TI - A blinded evaluation of the efficacy and safety of glycopyrronium, a once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist, versus tiotropium, in patients with COPD: the GLOW5 study
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12553
ER -
|
en_ZA |