Browsing by Subject "caesarean section"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    A retrospective audit of pain assessment and management post caesarean section at New Somerset Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa
    (2022) Munsaka, Effraim Frackson; van Dyk, Dominique; Parker, Romy
    Background: The most common major surgical procedure performed worldwide is the caesarean section (CS). Effective pain management is a priority for women undergoing this procedure, to reduce the incidence of persistent pain, (a risk factor for postpartum depression), as well as optimize maternal-neonatal bonding and the successful establishment of breastfeeding. Multimodal analgesia is the gold standard for post-caesarean section analgesia. At present, no perioperative pain management protocols could be identified for the management of patients presenting for CS at regional hospitals in South Africa. This audit aimed to review the folders of patients who underwent CS, with reference to perioperative pain management guidelines for CS. Methods: A descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional audit was conducted. Three hundred folders (10% of the annual number of caesarean procedures performed) from New Somerset Hospital, a regional hospital in Cape Town, South Africa were reviewed. Results: The women were a mean age of 30 years (SD 6.2). Median gravidity was 3 (IQR 2-3) and parity was 1 (IQR 1-2); 52% had previously undergone a CS. In 93.3%, spinal anaesthesia was employed for CS. Pain assessment was poor, with only 55 (18%) patients having their pain assessed on the day of the operation. Analgesia was prescribed in over 98% of the patients, however, medication was only administered as prescribed in 32.6%. Non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were prescribed in < 1.67% of cases. None of the patients received a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, or wound infusion catheter as supplementary strategies. Conclusions: Pain management for post-CS patient at this hospital is lacking. There is the need for the implementation of a structured assessment tool to improve administration of analgesics in these patients. In addition, the reasons for the omission of NSAIDs from the analgesia regimen requires investigation. Hospitals require post-CS pain protocols to guide management especially in resource-limited settings.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Open Access
    Perioperative caearean section pain management at Groote Schuur hospital ? an audit
    (2025) Giles, Daniel; Parker, Romy
    Background: Caesarean section is one of the commonest surgeries performed resulting in moderate-to-severe pain in a significant proportion of women. The PROSPECT (procedure specific postoperative pain management) group includes surgeons and anaesthetists who develop procedure-specific consensus recommendations on managing postoperative pain. Our audit compared current clinical practice to that recommended by the updated PROSPECT guidelines for caesarean section from 2020. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using the PAIN OUT standard operating procedures. The data were collected between 11 February and 5 March 2022 and uploaded onto the PAIN OUT registry. The appropriate data were extracted and used to describe the current standard of care directly against each of the nine interventions recommended by the PROSPECT guidelines. Results: A total of 84 patients were included in the audit. Five of the recommended interventions were not done at all (intrathecal long-acting opioid, preoperative oral paracetamol, intraoperative and postoperative NSAID, intraoperative intravenous dexamethasone), two intraoperative interventions were done poorly (intravenous paracetamol 15.5%, local anaesthetic 15.5%) and two postoperative interventions were done well (oral paracetamol 89.3%, intramuscular morphine 100%). Conclusion: Current clinical practice for the perioperative pain management of caesarean sections at this hospital falls short of best practice as outlined in the PROSPECT guidelines. The introduction of a perioperative protocol, and continuing education of doctors, nurses and patients on pain and its management may be effective ways to improve practice.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Sensory over-responsivity in children of 3-5 years: A descriptive, analytical study
    (2019) Watkyns, Ann Frances; Gretschel, Pamela; Buchanan, Helen
    BACKGROUND: Sensory over-responsivity (SOR) is a type of Sensory Modulation Disorder (SMD), where the individual has an over-responsive behavioural reaction to non-harmful or non-threatening sensory stimulation, which is out of proportion to the stimulus. SOR can negatively impact a child’s engagement and performance in their daily life. SOR is frequently diagnosed by occupational therapists, and deep pressure is an important facet of the treatment of SOR by occupational therapists. Prior research (Alberts & Ronca, 2012) indicates that the component of pressure in the vaginal birth process aids the infant’s neurophysiological adaption to extra-uterine life. This component is absent in elective caesarean section births. This study therefore set out to determine whether method of birth could be associated with SOR, as well as investigating demographic and other variables linked to SOR. It was hypothesised that there would be a higher prevalence of SOR in children aged 3-5 years born by elective caesarean section compared to those born by vaginal birth. The study objectives were: • To establish a profile (demographic and variables linked to SOR) of participants (mother-child dyads) by birth method group (CS or vaginal delivery) • To determine the prevalence of SOR by birth method • To establish if there is a statistically significant difference in SOR and birth method • To establish which variables (for example birth weight, jaundice, birth complications) are associated with SOR METHOD: A quantitative, descriptive, analytical study was conducted with a sample of 91 children between the ages of 3 years 0 months and 4 years 11 months. Children across various language, cultural and socio-economic groups were recruited and allocated to two groups based on their method of birth - vaginal delivery and elective caesarean section. Caregivers of each child completed the Short Sensory Profile 2 (SSP2) questionnaire as well as a demographic information questionnaire. The scores for SOR were calculated for each participant, and prevalence of SOR between the two birth method groups was compared. Demographic variables were tested for significance between the two groups. The variables showing a significant difference were further analysed to determine any association with SOR. RESULTS: There were 91 participants, 58 in the VB group and 33 in the CS group. Mothers in the VB group gave birth at a younger age (U = 499.0, p < .001), were of a lower income level (chi-square = 11.49, df = 2, p = .003) and more likely to be single (Fishers exact p (2-tailed) = .037). The children in the VB group were of a greater gestational age (U = 472.5, p = .001), had a shorter time period before the first breastfeed (U = 478.0, p = .006), and had fewer sleeping difficulties (Fishers exact p (2-tailed) = .003). The prevalence of SOR for the total sample was 22%. There was a significant association in SOR prevalence and birth method (Fishers exact p (2-tailed) = .034), with greater prevalence in the VB group (29%) as opposed to the elective CS group (9%). There were statistically significant associations between SOR and maternal age (U = 380.5, p = .004), marital status (Fishers exact p (2-tailed) = .003) and time after birth to the first breastfeed (U = 394.5, p = .049). CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant difference in SOR between the two birth method groups, with higher prevalence in the VB group. This was thought to be linked to cultural and language challenges associated with the use of the SSP2, and the impact of low socio-economic circumstances on child development and the ability to regulate sensory input. Recommendations include developing and validating a culturally appropriate sensory profile questionnaire, available in the most common official languages to facilitate the accurate assessment of sensory modulation of all children living in South Africa. In addition, there is a need to test the birth method hypothesis in demographically balanced groups.