• English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse OpenUCT
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "Petroleum Resources Development Act"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Open Access
    Dispute resolution under Section 54 of the MPRDA: An Imbalance of Conflicting Interests of the Landowner and the Right Holder
    (2024) Tsosane, Lelapa; Mostert, Hanri; Cramer, Richard Henry
    This dissertation examines the conflict between landowners and rights holders under the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA). The MPRDA empowers the minister to grant prospecting rights, impacting landowners' rights. While compensation is available for losses, delays in resolving disputes may stall prospecting operations. The dissertation argues that the current framework does not balance the conflicting interests of the landowner and the right holder adequately. It suggests that the compensation mechanism under section 54 of the MPRDA does not address the effects of delays on the mineral right holder's interests. It further discusses the effects of landowner's hindrance of prospecting operations through refusal of entry and denial of access, which ultimately impact the State's objectives under the MPRDA. Thus, this dissertation recommends a compensation agreement with set time limits for negotiation and dispute resolution between landowners and applicants for prospecting rights. This recommendation offers a nuanced and timebound solution for fair enforcement and better balancing of conflicting interests under the MPRDA.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Open Access
    The Regulation of South Africa's Emerging Hydrocarbon Sector: A purposive analysis of the Upstream Petroleum Resources Development Act 23 of 2024 compared to the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002
    (2025) Davids, Mogammed Wafiq; Mostert, Hanri
    This thesis compares South Africa's hydrocarbon regulatory provisions per the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 (MPRDA) and the recently enacted Upstream Petroleum Resources Development Act 23 of 2024 (UPRDA). Reform of South Africa's hydrocarbon regulatory framework was prompted by natural gas discoveries in the offshore Outeniqua Basin and the Karoo's shale gas reserves. South Africa's emerging hydrocarbon sector signals opportunities for widespread socio-economic development. Thus, understanding the purpose and function of South Africa's hydrocarbon regulatory framework is crucial for navigating South Africa's emerging sector. The MPRDA and the UPRDA entrust hydrocarbon resources to the state for public benefit, compelling similar objectives for its regulation and exploitation. Regulatory objectives envisage transformation, sustainable development, and socio-economic development. However, while the MPRDA and the UPRDA have similar regulatory objectives, different approaches are deployed to achieve them. The question driving this thesis is how South Africa's hydrocarbon legal framework should be understood to advance public benefit. Both legislative pieces are examined textually and contextually to determine their meaning and application. This thesis argues that indigenous hydrocarbons can provide the socio-economic boost South Africa needs for the population to advance. However, the regulatory objectives contained in both legislative texts provide insight into what public benefit should be expected from domestic hydrocarbon exploration and production and must be supported when domestic hydrocarbon rights are granted to oil companies. The legal analysis conducted in this thesis concludes that the UPRDA places South Africa in a better regulatory position to achieve the regulatory objectives and realise the public benefits of hydrocarbon extraction
UCT Libraries logo

Contact us

Jill Claassen

Manager: Scholarly Communication & Publishing

Email: openuct@uct.ac.za

+27 (0)21 650 1263

  • Open Access @ UCT

    • OpenUCT LibGuide
    • Open Access Policy
    • Open Scholarship at UCT
    • OpenUCT FAQs
  • UCT Publishing Platforms

    • UCT Open Access Journals
    • UCT Open Access Monographs
    • UCT Press Open Access Books
    • Zivahub - Open Data UCT
  • Site Usage

    • Cookie settings
    • Privacy policy
    • End User Agreement
    • Send Feedback

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS