Browsing by Author "Davids, Eugene L"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemOpen AccessCorrection to: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Africa: a scoping review of its application and validation(BioMed Central, 2018-01-31) Hoosen, Nikhat; Davids, Eugene L; de Vries, Petrus J; Shung-King, MayleneAbstract After publication of the article [1], it has been brought to our attention that the authors listed in Table 1 are in the wrong order. They should be listed as follows:
- ItemOpen AccessExploring condom use decision-making among adolescents: the synergistic role of affective and rational processes(2021-10-19) Davids, Eugene L; Zembe, Yanga; de Vries, Petrus J; Mathews, Catherine; Swartz, AlisonBackground Condom use remains the most effective behavioural method for the prevention of HIV and unplanned pregnancies. However, condom use remains inconsistent among young people. Exploring the condom use decision-making processes that adolescents engage in might provide information that would assist in the prevention of many challenges related to poor sexual and reproductive health outcomes. This study therefore aimed to explore the factors that influenced decision-making about sexual debut and condom use of adolescents from two schools in the Western Cape, South Africa. Methods A sample of 16 adolescents were selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected using semi-structured, individual interviews. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data generated. Results The link between sexual debut and affective processes was frequently discussed in condom use decision-making. Decisions about sexual debut were influenced by the belief that sex was a perceived symbol of ‘true love’ on the one hand, and respect for perceived parental expectations of age-appropriate sex, on the other. Condom use decision-making was shaped by adolescents’ concerns about their future and lack of stability in their lives. Adolescents’ fears of pregnancy, parenthood and disease shaped their condom use decision-making. It became evident that rational and affective decision-making in condom use choice were not mutually exclusive, but that these processes happened simultaneously. Conclusions The study highlighted the role of affective states as part of the process of examining alternatives when deciding to use a condom or not. Interventions to strengthen condom use decision-making should therefore incorporate not only rational but also affective processes to improve adolescent sexual and reproductive outcomes.