Browsing by Author "Dalvie, S"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Potential use of clinical polygenic risk scores in psychiatry – ethical implications and communicating high polygenic risk
    (BioMed Central, 2019-02-27) Palk, A C; Dalvie, S; de Vries, J; Martin, A R; Stein, D J
    Abstract Psychiatric disorders present distinct clinical challenges which are partly attributable to their multifactorial aetiology and the absence of laboratory tests that can be used to confirm diagnosis or predict risk. Psychiatric disorders are highly heritable, but also polygenic, with genetic risk conferred by interactions between thousands of variants of small effect that can be summarized in a polygenic risk score. We discuss four areas in which the use of polygenic risk scores in psychiatric research and clinical contexts could have ethical implications. First, there is concern that clinical use of polygenic risk scores may exacerbate existing health inequities. Second, research findings regarding polygenic risk could be misinterpreted in stigmatising or discriminatory ways. Third, there are concerns associated with testing minors as well as eugenics concerns elicited by prenatal polygenic risk testing. Fourth, potential challenges that could arise with the feedback and interpretation of high polygenic risk for a psychiatric disorder would require consideration. While there would be extensive overlap with the challenges of feeding back genetic findings in general, the potential clinical use of polygenic risk scoring warrants discussion in its own right, given the recency of this possibility. To this end, we discuss how lay interpretations of risk and genetic information could intersect. Consideration of these factors would be necessary for ensuring effective and constructive communication and interpretation of polygenic risk information which, in turn, could have implications for the uptake of any therapeutic recommendations. Recent advances in polygenic risk scoring have major implications for its clinical potential, however, care should be taken to ensure that communication of polygenic risk does not feed into problematic assumptions regarding mental disorders or support reductive interpretations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Psychosis and relapse in bipolar disorder are related to GRM3 DAOA and GRIN2B genotype
    (2010) Dalvie, S; Horn, Neil; Nossek, Christel; van der Merwe, L; Stein, Dan; Ramesar, Raj
    Objective: Dysfunction in glutamate signalling is thought to play a role in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD). There is evidence of associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in GRM3, GRIN2B, and DAOA genes and the diagnosis of BD. In this pilot study, we investigated the frequency of SNP variants in these 3 genes within South African population groups, and assessed interactions between genes and phenotypes of BD disease severity. Method: Multiplex SNaPshotTM PCR was used to genotype 191 case and 188 control samples. Cases comprised of 191 individuals in a South African cohort of mixed ancestry and Caucasians, with BD Type 1. Phenotypes of BD disease severity were: age of onset, number of illness episodes, number of hospitalisations for depression or mania and history of psychotic symptoms. Results: There were no significant difference in SNP allele frequencies between cases and controls. In the case-only analysis, the GRM3 rs6465084 heterozygote was associated with a 4-fold increased risk of lifetime history of psychotic symptoms, and the specific variants within the gene pair, DAOA and GRIN2B, had a significant interaction with the number of hospitalisations for mania, with lowest admission rates associated with both pairs of ancestral alleles.Conclusion: In BD, variations in glutamatergic genes may influence phenotypes related to the severity of illness. Speculatively, newly derived genes associated with various evolutionary advantages, may also increase the risk for more severe BD. These preliminary findings deserve validation in a larger cohort.