Estimating the abundance of common dolphins on the southern coast of South Africa

dc.contributor.authorBest, Peter B
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Michael A
dc.contributor.authorde Decker, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorSekiguchi, Keiko
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-26T13:31:03Z
dc.date.available2016-02-26T13:31:03Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.updated2016-02-26T11:03:19Z
dc.description.abstractSightings made on an aerial survey in December 1982 and on a ship-based survey in January/February 1983 have been used to assess the size of the population of common dolphins (Delphinus capensis) occurring over the continental shelf south of South Africa. Thirteen sightings (12 primary) were made in 2,445.7 n. miles flown on the aerial survey and 10 sightings (6 primary) in 1,772.2 n. miles steamed on the ship-based survey. Sightings and effort in both surveys have been stratified by water depth (0-100 m, 100- 200 m) and geographical region (west coast, south coast). Because of difficulties in accurately estimating the size of schools in this highly gregarious species, numbers of individuals were counted in composite aerial photographs taken of the school. Radial distance and angle estimates to sightings from the ship were smeared to allow for estimation errors. Assuming g(0) = 1.0, both data sets resulted in roughly similar estimates of the number of schools (52-58 for aerial, 40-59 for ship-based across a range of sensitivity tests), but mean school size estimates differed significantly (454 SE 90 for aerial, 159 SE 27 for ship-based). As the aerial estimates were based on counts of animals in composite vertical photographs, they are considered more reliable than the ship-based estimates that were made from a lower vantage point and at a greater angle. Given the small number of primary sightings on each survey, it was considered preferable to produce a combined estimate using school density estimates from both surveys weighted by their inverse variances but applying the mean school size from the aircraft. The resultant population estimate of 49 schools (CV = 0.29) and 22200 individuals (CV = 0.35) is discussed in relation to known or estimated incidental mortalities in South African waters.en_ZA
dc.identifier.apacitationBest, P. B., Meyer, M. A., de Decker, M., Müller, A., & Sekiguchi, K. (2009). <i>Estimating the abundance of common dolphins on the southern coast of South Africa</i> University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Marine Resource Assessment and Management Group. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17299en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationBest, Peter B, Michael A Meyer, Michelle de Decker, Andrea Müller, and Keiko Sekiguchi <i>Estimating the abundance of common dolphins on the southern coast of South Africa.</i> University of Cape Town ,Faculty of Science ,Marine Resource Assessment and Management Group, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17299en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationBest, Peter B; Meyer, Michael A; de Decker, Michelle; Müller, Andrea; Sekiguchi, Keiko. (2009). Estimating the abundance of common dolphins on the southern coast of South Africa,IWC Paper SC/61/SM33.en_ZA
dc.identifier.ris TY - Working Paper AU - Best, Peter B AU - Meyer, Michael A AU - de Decker, Michelle AU - Müller, Andrea AU - Sekiguchi, Keiko AB - Sightings made on an aerial survey in December 1982 and on a ship-based survey in January/February 1983 have been used to assess the size of the population of common dolphins (Delphinus capensis) occurring over the continental shelf south of South Africa. Thirteen sightings (12 primary) were made in 2,445.7 n. miles flown on the aerial survey and 10 sightings (6 primary) in 1,772.2 n. miles steamed on the ship-based survey. Sightings and effort in both surveys have been stratified by water depth (0-100 m, 100- 200 m) and geographical region (west coast, south coast). Because of difficulties in accurately estimating the size of schools in this highly gregarious species, numbers of individuals were counted in composite aerial photographs taken of the school. Radial distance and angle estimates to sightings from the ship were smeared to allow for estimation errors. Assuming g(0) = 1.0, both data sets resulted in roughly similar estimates of the number of schools (52-58 for aerial, 40-59 for ship-based across a range of sensitivity tests), but mean school size estimates differed significantly (454 SE 90 for aerial, 159 SE 27 for ship-based). As the aerial estimates were based on counts of animals in composite vertical photographs, they are considered more reliable than the ship-based estimates that were made from a lower vantage point and at a greater angle. Given the small number of primary sightings on each survey, it was considered preferable to produce a combined estimate using school density estimates from both surveys weighted by their inverse variances but applying the mean school size from the aircraft. The resultant population estimate of 49 schools (CV = 0.29) and 22200 individuals (CV = 0.35) is discussed in relation to known or estimated incidental mortalities in South African waters. DA - 2009 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2009 T1 - Estimating the abundance of common dolphins on the southern coast of South Africa TI - Estimating the abundance of common dolphins on the southern coast of South Africa UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17299 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/17299
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationBest PB, Meyer MA, de Decker M, Müller A, Sekiguchi K. Estimating the abundance of common dolphins on the southern coast of South Africa. 2009 [cited yyyy month dd]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17299en_ZA
dc.languageengen_ZA
dc.publisher.departmentMarine Resource Assessment and Management Groupen_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Scienceen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.titleEstimating the abundance of common dolphins on the southern coast of South Africaen_ZA
dc.typeWorking Paperen_ZA
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
uct.type.publicationResearchen_ZA
uct.type.resourceResearch paperen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Best_Estimating_abundance_2009.pdf
Size:
165.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections