How Much Punishment Is Deserved? Two Alternatives to Proportionality

Journal Article

2022-03-03

Permanent link to this Item
Authors
Journal Title

Philosophies

Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Publisher
Series
Abstract
When it comes to the question of how much the state ought to punish a given offender, the standard understanding of the desert theory for centuries has been that it should give him a penalty proportionate to his offense, that is, an amount of punishment that fits the severity of his crime. In this article, we maintain that a desert theorist is not conceptually or otherwise required to hold a proportionality requirement. We show that there is logical space for at least two other, non-proportionate ways of meting out deserved penalties, and we also argue that they have important advantages relative to the dominant, proportionality approach.
Description

Reference:

Collections