Recovering for a loss of a chance of survival: loss of a chance in South African medical malpractice

DSpace/Manakin Repository

 

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Price, Alistair en_ZA
dc.contributor.author Busch, Stefanie en_ZA
dc.date.accessioned 2017-09-14T12:26:39Z
dc.date.available 2017-09-14T12:26:39Z
dc.date.issued 2017 en_ZA
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11427/25202
dc.description.abstract This dissertation seeks to argue that the doctrine of a loss of a chance should be adopted into South African law, specifically within the medical malpractice field. This doctrine allows for a physician to be held delictually liable for causing a loss of a chance of recovery or survival in medical misdiagnosis cases where a physician negligently failed to diagnose a curable disease, and the patient is thus harmed by or succumbs to such a disease. It is this writer's objective to demonstrate why such a doctrine ought to be introduced into South African delictual law as a secondary claim which is to be available once a claimant is unable to meet the traditional test for causation, and then evaluate in which manner this doctrine should be integrated into the law, keeping in mind South Africa's law of delict and the court's past practices in developing delictual principles. Two different approaches predominately adopted in other jurisdictions in order to overcome the concerns regarding how the doctrine disregards the causation standard will be discussed. The first approach, the 'substantial possibility' approach, calls for the relaxation of the causation standard in specific cases, whilst the second approach, the 'pure chance' approach, views the loss of a chance as an autonomous injury in and of itself. Each of the two approaches are evaluated in relation to South Africa's delictual law, as well as its judiciary's past practices in developing delictual principles. By doing so this writer will illustrate which approach is more beneficial and suitable within the South African delictual law context. It is this writer's contention that, in order to ensure the effectiveness of the doctrine, it would be wiser to introduce the loss of a chance doctrine by ways of wrongfulness, whereby the court could create a new harm which is wrongful in the eyes of the law if it holds that it is reasonable, in terms of public policy and the views of the community, to hold a physician responsible for negligently causing the patient to lose a chance of survival or a cure. By means of wrongfulness, the loss of a chance doctrine can therefore be integrated into South African delictual law on a strong fundamental foothold as to not impeach and threaten the effectiveness of the doctrine in future. en_ZA
dc.language.iso eng en_ZA
dc.subject.other Private Law en_ZA
dc.subject.other Delictual Law en_ZA
dc.subject.other Delictual Liability en_ZA
dc.title Recovering for a loss of a chance of survival: loss of a chance in South African medical malpractice en_ZA
dc.type Thesis en_ZA
uct.type.publication Research en_ZA
uct.type.resource Thesis en_ZA
dc.publisher.institution University of Cape Town
dc.publisher.faculty Faculty of Law en_ZA
dc.publisher.department Department of Private Law en_ZA
dc.type.qualificationlevel Masters en_ZA
dc.type.qualificationname LLM en_ZA
uct.type.filetype Text
uct.type.filetype Image


Files in This Item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Total Visits Views
Recovering for a loss of a chance of survival: loss of a chance in South African medical malpractice 17
Total Visits Per Month Mar 2017 Apr 2017 May 2017 Jun 2017 Jul 2017 Aug 2017 Sep 2017
Recovering for a loss of a chance of survival: loss of a chance in South African medical malpractice 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
File Visits Views
thesis_law_2017_busch_stefanie.pdf 18
File Visits Per Month Mar 2017 Apr 2017 May 2017 Jun 2017 Jul 2017 Aug 2017 Sep 2017
thesis_law_2017_busch_stefanie.pdf 0 0 0 0 0 0 18